awful.systems
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Mubelotix to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year ago

Linkedin

jlai.lu

message-square
57
fedilink
641

Linkedin

jlai.lu

Mubelotix to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year ago
message-square
57
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • @itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    100•1 year ago

    AI = 0 □

    • @InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      10•
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        9•1 year ago

        (MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn’t give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.

        Instead you’d get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2

        And that’s not even the correct formula. It’s

        E^2 = (mc(2))2 + (pc)^2

        You can’t just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).

        The way to remember this is that it’s equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).

        So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.

        • @itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          3•1 year ago

          In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)

          • @Technus@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            3•1 year ago

            Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?

            And where does the O(v^4) term come from?

    • Redjard
      link
      fedilink
      4•1 year ago

      This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d’Alembert operator at the end

  • @velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    53•
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • Norgur
      link
      fedilink
      49•1 year ago

      Sounds like some bullshit artist motivational speaker

      • MubelotixOP
        link
        fedilink
        19•1 year ago

        Probably an AI expert too

        • Norgur
          link
          fedilink
          7•1 year ago

          And a Bitcoin Scholar

          • MubelotixOP
            link
            fedilink
            4•1 year ago

            Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire “crypto” shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways

    • @lol_idk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      9•1 year ago

      WTF does Indian have to do with anything?

      • @velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23•
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          5•1 year ago

          Basically the same is happening to boomers, e. g. in Europe, too. Also ageism is happening here too. I don’t know, how much worse it is over on your part of the planet, but here you’re also not taken seriously when you’re young

      • @Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        2•1 year ago

        So you feel this is perhaps racist but no concern for it also being perhaps ageist?

        • @lol_idk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          1•
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Deleted

      • @UckyBon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1•
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nothing. There is a lot of anti-asian racism going on here on Lemmy.

  • @NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    46•1 year ago

    It also means AI = 0

    • Nemo's public admirer
      link
      fedilink
      10•
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard about an extended version of the equation:
      E2 = m2c4 + p2c2
      Or E = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2

      If so, AI = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2 - mc2

      I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

  • TimeSquirrel
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    44•1 year ago

    So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood…

    • @gimsy@feddit.it
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      4•1 year ago

      Well math might be, physics for sure isn’t

      • @ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0•1 year ago

        I feel like you are forgetting QCD, where they actually added a splash of colour to change the mood of the reader.

  • @doctordevice@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    40•1 year ago

    As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I’d bet money that was written by an LLM.

    • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      17•1 year ago

      How did it lose so much quality since it was posted just a week or two ago?

      • @doctordevice@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        13•1 year ago

        The ways of compression artifacts are mysterious.

        • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          3•1 year ago

          😆

      • @lol_idk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        3•
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Deleted

        • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          2•1 year ago

    • @stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      10•
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • @toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38•1 year ago

    LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity

  • RayJW
    link
    fedilink
    31•1 year ago

    !linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works back at it again with some more AI bs.

    • @Lemonyoda@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      3•1 year ago

      Ist there actually an upcomming alternative for Job profiles and stuff?

  • Ayumu Tsukasa
    link
    fedilink
    27•1 year ago

    I love that’s it’s not “what are you on about?” it’s just a general what

    • @Logh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      32•1 year ago

      I always found the difference between general and special whativity fascinating.

      • @InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        0•1 year ago

        deleted by creator

    • @poinck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      2•
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It goes on like this:

      What

      The

      Actual

      F***

      Is

      This?

  • tactical_trans_karen [she/her, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24•1 year ago

    Reading this is an actual cognitive hazard.

  • Sentient Loom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20•1 year ago

    I want to know who this idiot is.

    • @stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      11•
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • @Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      8•1 year ago

      I mean, the equation isn’t wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.

    • @Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      2•1 year ago

      I choose to believe he’s just looking for VC money and is not actually that stupid lol

  • @wesley@yall.theatl.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17•1 year ago

    This reads like a post written by AI as well lol

  • @emerald@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    12•1 year ago

    AI+8k+5G

    • Nemo's public admirer
      link
      fedilink
      4•1 year ago

      We need a = sign sonewhere, right?

      • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8•1 year ago

        Nope, none of this is math.

        • Nemo's public admirer
          link
          fedilink
          1•
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For aesthetics n ‘legitimacy’?

  • Alex
    link
    fedilink
    11•1 year ago

    they did the meth right

  • @onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    11•1 year ago

    I like how the OP’s name was censored for their privacy, but not the name of the person responding. Also, what the hell are these people huffing?

  • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    11•1 year ago

    When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.

Memes@lemmy.ml

!memes@lemmy.ml

remote_follow_modal_title

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 1.48K users / day
  • 2.98K users / week
  • 6.26K users / month
  • 20.8K users / 6 months
  • 51K subscribers
  • 12.6K Posts
  • 236K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop
  • @sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • Cyclohexane
  • Arthur Besse
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org