• @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    "Texan Craig Adlong. He pleaded guilty in 2020 for lying on firearm transaction forms, saying the guns were for his personal use. He purchased 95 semi-automatic rifles at Guns Unlimited in Katy, Texas, making seven visits over two months.

    Sixty-six of those firearms were recovered in Mexico, according to the leak."

    How many is too many “for personal use”?

    95 guns of the same type is CLEARLY not for personal use. 13 guns per visit x 7 visits? No questions?

    I can see buying multiple guns in different form factors, because they’re a tool like anything else, and you need the right size tool for the job.

    But if you’re out buying 95 #0 Phillips screwdrivers, that’s not “for personal use”.

    • @catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 year ago

      ATF says multiple sales of rifles must be reported. A “multiple sale” is defined as “when a licensed dealer or pawnbroker sells or otherwise disposes of, at one time or during any five consecutive business days, more than one semiautomatic rifle capable of accepting a detachable magazine and with a caliber greater than .22 (including .223/5.56 caliber) to an unlicensed person.”

      95 rifles in seven visits obviously qualifies. These absolutely should have been reported.

    • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I can see buying multiple guns in different form factors, because they’re a tool like anything else, and you need the right size tool for the job.

      As you need proper training on each individual gun i find it hard to believe that there is any person who reasonably needs more than 5 or 6 firearms and that includes sports, hunting and self defense

      • NoIWontPickAName
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        You don’t need proper training in every one, you need to be trained in pistols, rifles, and shotguns, and honestly you could probably just do long guns and hand guns, but I just feel like people should really be trained in all 3.

        There are just too many differences between hunting rifles and shotguns.

        I’m not even going to touch “self defense” rifles like an AR-15 because unless you live out in the sticks you will just be endangering your neighbors with how far they travel.

        • @ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Actually studies show that a proper .223 or 5.56 JHP (or soft, varmint, or frangible) penetrates less through drywall than 00 buck.

          I mean, yeah, the steel core penetrators will zip right through, but that isn’t on the gun that’s on you not knowing what ammo to use.

          • Liz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            The dude made a distinction between an AR and a regular rifle, implying the bullet travels further if it’s launched from an AR platform. I don’t think they know much about penetration characteristics.

        • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          And each gun needs to be zeroed individually, needs to be maintained individually, behaves differently… Someone who has four hunting rifles will be a worse shot than someone who has one and uses it for everything. The notion of needing “specific tools” just stops making sense at that point.

          • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I mean… I had a raccoon problem, right? Mom, dad, three babies. Babies were cute, but were tearing up the place and screaming, OMG, like 1,000 cat fights every night.

            But the problem was dad was getting aggressive, hanging out on the roof, and showing ZERO fear of people.

            Now I COULD have picked up my grandfathers .30-06, but then the problem then would have been scraping raccoon parts off the roof and nobody has time for that.

            So I went the other direction. Took my dad’s 1000fps pellet rifle and shot him in the ass. Not only did he set off running, he took mom and babies with him.

            So, yeah, right tool for the job. ;)

      • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Well, rifles are rifles and pistols are pistols. The skill set downgrades pretty easy, upgrading not so much.

        After shooting my .45-70 Government, a .22 pea shooter is no big deal, going the OTHER way though…

          • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            Nah, never shot anything more threatening than an old school metal coffee can. Just being a gun owner doesn’t make you dangerous.

            I own several hammers too, doesn’t make me a carpenter. ;)

            • @Hackworth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              Oh I was just making a dumb joke about calling a 22 a pea. I’m a videographer and don’t own a camera, haha.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Excuse me, but do not crush my dream of diving into a pit filled with #0 Phillips screwdrivers.

    • @PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Best use case I can tgink of for multiple copies of the same gun is torture tests? Or something similar where the gun is not expected to be functional afterwards. And even then >~5 is kind of excessive.

      • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I could see that. Multiples of the same gun so you could, I dunno, test one in a salt water environment, freshwater rainforest, desert, arctic, and control.

        But 95? Yeah, no.

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    capitalism enabling the cartels causing the drug war to happen?

    Who would’ve guessed.

  • @Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 year ago

    From 2006-2011 agents in Arizona stood down as straw purchasers illegally bought 2,000 guns at shops, intending to use the information to track trafficking patterns and arrest the kingpins. However, agents didn’t deliver the high-level arrests – and in the process, they lost track of hundreds of guns.

    This is the shit I think of when I’m paying my taxes.

    • Buelldozer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This shit is why 2A Advocates were so pissed off about Operation Fast & Furious and wouldn’t shut up about it for years. The BATFE forced the gun shops involved to sell the weapons even when they didn’t want to!

      Seriously, the whole thing was a shitshow from start to finish and when the manure caught fire everyone involved from the Field Agents through AG Eric Holder lied their assess off about it.

  • @RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    Most Texans are not cool with other Texans destroying Mexico for 30 pieces of silver.

    Ok Texas. Do something.

    “People are saying”™ that Liberals are behind it.

  • @girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    “I respect that the U.S. government wants this shielded, but it’s frustrating that the information isn’t public,” said Celorio, who is leading his country’s lawsuit against American gun manufacturers and five Arizona gun shops. “I think the average American would be surprised that the fentanyl crisis is nurtured because of the number of firearms going to Mexico to empower the cartels.”

    Jfc. :(

  • @DFWSAM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    This illustrates perfectly the need to be able to sue gun manufacturers & retailers. Until they’re hit in the pocketbook, this shit’ll never stop.

  • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s two sides to every tortilla and as a gun runner, I’m very upset my personal information might be involved in this hack. We need comprehensive privacy laws and real consequences for data breaches. Otherwise, these tech companies will treat this like a cost of doing business.

  • @lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Didn’t we know this for years?

    We’re a net-exporter of firearms to south of the border.

    In effect, we’ve created a key component of the problem that inevitably feeds mass migration north to flee said crime and poverty.

  • @shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    U.S. gun shops and smugglers tied to 78,000 firearms recovered south of the border

    Oh shit! Wild reveal coming up!

    The top 6 (see chart in the article) account for 1,102 total guns, 1.4%. 942 from Academy and Cabela’s, 1.2%.

    So, uh, what’s the story here? That a tiny fraction of guns recovered were from 2 of America’s top gun retail outlets?

    This is a non-story, nothing to see here except a couple of small timers profiteering.

    • Liz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Nevermind that a lot of the purchases required reporting anyway since buying lots of guns does actually get the attention of law enforcement. People are acting like the US government is keeping its eyes closed.

  • @bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    I thought we were over the whole “USA bad m’kay” but then shit like that turns up. It’s not okay.

  • @Gennadios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    This is exactly what I expected to read. Latin gangs keep unaligned affiliates (mostly girlfriends) as straw buyers to pass background checks. I don’t see how its the sellers folault, seems like we just cant keep our migrant and gamg problem under control.

    • @PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Straw purchasing isn’t an issue in most countries. Buying a weapon may include background checks, psychological evaluation, safety training, being a member at a range or club for 6+ months or even military service. It doesn’t end there either, with many countries requiring registration of purchased firearms with heavy fines if you’re unable to produce the weapon when asked.

      Luckily for cartels and criminals, Americas gun laws are dogshit. With private sales, you don’t even need to pass a background check in some places. Straw purchasing isn’t just viable, it’s the fastest, easiest, lowest risk way to secure practically any semi-automatic weapon you want.

      But no matter how serious or widespread those failures are, the pro-gun community staunchly opposes addressing them, backed by lobby groups who are keenly aware their profits would be quartered if gun regulations worked.