Joe Biden will not be the Democratic nominee in November’s presidential election, thankfully. He is not withdrawing because he’s being held responsible for enabling war crimes against the Palestinian people (though a recent poll does have nearly 40 percent of Americans saying they’re less likely to vote for him thanks to his handling of the war). Yet it’s impossible to extricate the collapse in public faith in the Biden campaign from the “uncommitted” movement for Gaza. They were the first people to refuse him their votes, and defections from within the president’s base hollowed out his support well in advance of the debate.

The Democrats and their presumptive nominee Kamala Harris are faced with a choice: On the one hand, they can continue Biden’s monstrous support for Netanyahu, the brutal IDF, and Israel’s genocide of Palestinians. That would help allow the party to cover for Biden and put a positive spin on a smooth handoff, even though we all know this would mainly benefit the embittered president himself and his small coterie of loyalists. Such a choice would confirm that the institutional rot that allowed the current situation to develop still characterizes the party.

  • @just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    6411 months ago

    At this point it’s very clear it’s not Biden’s policy that is holding things up. It’s very clearly Netanyahu and his cabinet. This isn’t even a question anymore as Benny Gantz straight said so when he resigned, and then Netanyahu dissolved his war cabinet, so he’s basically acting in direct control of Israeli forces it seems.

    Biden and team had a ceasefire agreement, Israel said they agreed, Palestine said they agreed, yet Israel refuses to sign or stop military assault. As far as the “undecided” voters go, they aren’t going to get their way. The US as a nation is not going to jeopardize ties with Israel as a proxy military force and ground position in the Middle East for a small percentage of voters. It is what it is, but put the blame where it belongs in the here and now.

    • subversive_dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Ronald Reagan made one phone call and the Israelis immediately stopped bombarding Lebanon. The vassal state has to do whatever the fuck the US president wants. It’s a complete joke to think otherwise. Joe Biden could go on TV right now and publicly withdraw support for the occupiers and their government and military would collapse overnight.

      • @just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1111 months ago

        Oh, awesome. Let’s time travel back then and act like it’s now, OH WAIT.

        The Israeli state of 40 years only existed due to the US and it’s money. That’s not necessarily the same situation now. They can buy their own toys, and not be a puppet of the US if they didn’t want to now.

        • subversive_dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You seriously think the Israeli state could survive a loss of US support? They are just as much a vassal as they were then, if not more. They are completely isolated on the world stage and surrounded by geopolitical rivals. Their society is crumbling as we speak. Without the US playing defense, the international community would have come down on Israel decades ago. Do you remember how much they freaked out when Joe Biden kinda sorta hinted that he might possibly not send them all the bombs they wanted?

          • That’s not the issue. In fact, if the US didn’t pay their bills, we already know what will happen, and it’s a national security scenario that is gamed and updated regularly.

            So say Israel is like “fuck you, pay me” to the US, and we cut them off. They are surrounded by hostile territories that will immediately put all their resources into attacking them and trying to wipe them off the map. Russia and China will probably proxy war this out as well. Then what? Maybe a coalition is made from a few of the Middle Eastern countries, groups hostile towards the US are fully enabled and encouraged to fuck with us, so now you have a new Middle East united group aligned with Russia and China to fuck around with Europe and Africa. Doesn’t sound super great to me. You’re pretty much kicking off a precursor to another world war, and Israel knows this. I’m sure they’ve probably just flatly said it behind closed doors.

            • subversive_dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              “According to our simulations that we ran for ourselves, very bad things will happen if we are not in charge. Therefore anything we do to maintain hegemony is justified.”

              Forgive me for sleeping on some sort of Orson Scott Card geopolitics fantasy, based on assumptions that other countries will be just as imperialistic as the USA. I’m much more concerned about the current ongoing genocide of the Palestinians that has continued for over 50 years.

          • SaltySalamander
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            The US gives israel what, like 3-4billion a year? Their defense budget was like 24b in 2023. They’d be fine without us.

      • FenrirIII
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        A lot has changed in 40 years. Jewish money in politics, for one.

        • subversive_dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          I wouldn’t personally go with “Jewish Money” as the terminology…😬

          That aside, certainly the effect of AIPAC and friends is a part of the pathology. That doesn’t change the fact that Joe Biden could end the genocide anytime he wanted. The Zionist entity cannot survive without US hard power backing.

          • FenrirIII
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            I mean, it comes from people who identify as Jewish and who support the state of Israel. How is that not correct?

            Joe Biden cannot stop Israel. They have openly and repeatedly made known their plan to conquer Gaza. They’re already allowing “settlers” (terrorists) in to attack the local Palestinians and steal their land. American citizens, including many who donate to AIPAC, are getting involved in land deals for the conquered territory.

            The entire powerbase of the western world is either taking part in the genocide and/or profiting from it or unable to do the right thing because of the political and financial power of the former.

            Even if that wasn’t the case, Israel is the only friendly nation in the middle east for western powers. Iran regularly starts shit and Saudi Arabia committed 9/11 (which we ignore because they have oil). A Jewish state is much friendlier to the (mostly white, Christian) government of the US.

            • subversive_dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              311 months ago

              Joe Biden could order a blockade on the single functioning port. Joe Biden’s Treasury department could instantly destroy the occupier economy with sanctions, as they should be doing under US and international law. Joe Biden could signal to the Iranians and Hezbollah that Israel is no longer allowed to operate with impunity.

              Don’t make the mistake of confusing pretend impotence for true impotence.

              I agree that the entire West is complicit in the genocide.

              Regarding “friendly nations,” what happened to make the Iranians unfriendly to the United States?

      • @HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        911 months ago

        The United States would be throwing its own strategic interests under a bus.

        I know this may come as a shock, but the US government is well aware what is happening over there, and knows considerably more that the average person. They aren’t doing nothing because of lack of evidence, or death, or allegations (both proven and otherwise). They do nothing because its in their interests to do so.

        I use the example of “no blood for oil”. They only said that because they still had oil - start losing access to key parts of your strategic access and absolutely we would be crying for war.

      • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        511 months ago

        The US has little to no influence over Israeli domestic politics. Pretending that Israel is a puppet state of the US is… delusional.

        • @itsgoodtobeawake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          Well then they won’t mind when we stop providing US made weapons to continue their aggressions, cutoff the billions in annual support, and stop blocking international efforts at holding them accountable. Why would Netanyahu be addressing our government if we had no skin in the game?

          You’re either uninformed or trolling, we are Israel’s largest ally and we constantly shield them from international repercussions.

        • @YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          You don’t understand, this is the only chance for the east to eradicate Israel AND the USA.

          It doesn’t matter if their moral stance is built on lies and dishonesty. Morality was never their lynchpin.

    • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      I mean, yeah, that’s largely true with regard to who’s holding progress on peace talks up, but I want to see any and all military aid that’s not purely defensive that we’re sending to Israel cut off, like, yesterday. There is zero reason why we should be selling and delivering new F-35s and JDAMs to the IDF when they’re just using them to flatten the Gaza Strip.

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      While at the same time pursuing policies and choices that will actually stand some chance of benefiting the Palestinian people – among them, being vocal with congress, doing direct demonstrations, doing things like the “uncommitted” vote to make it clear to those in power that the minority that wants decent treatment for the Palestinians is also not a trivial constituency, oh and also:

      MAKE SURE HARRIS WINS IN NOVEMBER SO THAT THE IDF DOESN’T START GETTING UNEQUIVOCAL US SUPPORT AND AMP UP THEIR WAR CRIMES TENFOLD

      The others are optional; the last one is critical.

    • Jesus
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      Nature ain’t fully healed yet. A big pile of Christian nationalists and people conned by billionaires are going to rollout hard for Trump in Nov.

      • @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Far more worried about the “Democrats” who were trying to force a Trump presidency by insisting we nominate Biden. They need to be ostracized and held accountable. Scratch a Blue MAGA and you find genocide supporting zionist under the cheap tin foil of abwd. They just about cost us the entire game.

        Who ever they are, where ever they are, the need to be named, shamed, and ignored.

        Kamala can make a strong move on this with her VP pick. Its not even a “nice to have”, its a need to have. Biden had cost the Democrats MI, WI, and turned MN into a swing state; this was 100% due to his ABSOLUTE bumbling of Gaza. Those voters are now “available” again.

        There are plenty of progressives like Jamie Raskin she could pick, but it doesn’t really matter. She NEEDS all three of those states for an EC victory, and she doesn’t get them with the current policies. Either she can anchor and the VP can move, or the VP can anchor and Kamala moves. Either way, its pretty obvious what she needs to do, because there is no path to the WH without these states.

  • @BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    811 months ago

    You mean giving Bombs and Money to Israel while saying “Israel is iffy” wasn’t a Good Policy?

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 months ago

    Since severing ties with Israel would only lead to more chaos in the region, what I’m really hoping for is Kamala 2025, followed by a change in Israeli leadership to mirror the recent US, UK, and French elections that have seen a broadly decimated right wing, and a strengthening of the centre left view of an international rules-based order. We could potentially see Bibi’s regime tried for war crimes, China dissuaded from its designs on Taiwan, and Russia faced with stiffer international resolve in Ukraine and beyond.

    I’m not prepared to defend any of that as immensely realistic, but writing it was the little taste of hope I needed in the moment.

    • subversive_dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1411 months ago

      Since severing ties with Israel would only lead to more chaos in the region

      Oh I’m sold. Do as much genocide as you want, as long as you are an implement of United States’ resource extraction policy.

      We would certainly prefer you didn’t do the genocide, but loss of hegemony is what is truly unacceptable, that’s a red line we won’t cross.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        I was just imagining a slightly better world, as a treat. Of course I’d prefer an even better outcome like peace and willing reparations, but I wasn’t in the mood for an entirely counterfactual daydream. The current reality is an actual nightmare.

        • subversive_dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          You know, I definitely ignored the rest of your comment, that’s fair.

          I share your hope that VP Harris won’t be as intransigent in support of the occupiers as Biden.

      • @Timii@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        The choice is more like permitting the current ongoing tragedy or allow an even greater genocide (the eradication of Israel).

        • subversive_dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          Definitely a false choice, right off the bat.

          The USA could impose a no-fly zone based on the 1949 borders.

          The settlers could be rightly expelled from the West Bank.

          Palestine could be recognized as an independent state.

          None of that requires any cooperation from the right-wing death cult currently controlling the occupiers.

          None of that requires a genocide, just the long overdue abandonment of illegal settlements.

          • @Timii@biglemmowski.win
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            just the long overdue abandonment of illegal settlements

            ‘Just’. Green Line didn’t work in 1949. Why would it work now? You really think anything but Israel ceasing to exist would stop this nonsense?

            • subversive_dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Was there a no-fly zone and recognition of an independent state in 1949? Why are you treating right-wing genocidists as though they are a force of nature?

              Seems like quick work for the armored bulldozers so beloved by the occupiers, if karma is a real thing…

                • subversive_dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 months ago

                  The solution is not enabling the settlers and ultra-orthodox.

                  Another option is destroying / blockading the last functioning Zionist port, I expect that will get results real quick. They have decided to build their civilization inspired by the worst excesses of the West, so it will quickly collapse in the absence of endless imports.

                  Once you turn the grim logic of destroying houses and resource starvation back on the occupiers, you don’t have to keep pretending that they are mysterious, incomprehensible, and immovable.

    • @eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      followed by a change in Israeli leadership to mirror the recent US, UK, and French elections that have seen a broadly decimated right wing and a strengthening of the centre left view of an international rules-based order.

      new labor mp’s in the uk have decided to support the genocide and threatened the icc from ruling against isreal, as the tories promised, and macron is intriguing with the far right to run france, saying that nobody won the election. so yes, their voters wanted center left; but their leaders are ignoring it and forcing the status quo.

      the us election is still over 3 months away. kamala isn’t much different than biden in ways that matter and all indications suggests that she’s going to continue supporting the genocide as well despite publicly advocating against it the entire time it’s been a thing.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        You saw someone write a thing that they openly admitted was unrealistic and purely to indulge in a crumb of hope, and you felt this comment was necessary. Are you okay?

        • @eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          hopium is the reason we got biden and what other awful politicians use as cover to get elected.

          the real world sucks and hopium is a children’s coping mechanism; i hope you’re the one that’s okay.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    711 months ago

    bidens policy has been more pro gaza/ceasefire then american policy towards gaza for a long time why would you want to break from it

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      There’s nothing pro Palestinian about repeating Israeli propaganda uncritically, blaming the Palestinians for everything, and being the primary supplier of weapons and ammunition for the genocide.

  • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    Biden’s problem is that he has no “Gaza policy”. He has an “Israel policy” and as long as Israeli interests are major political donators, that’s not going to change.

    https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?ind=Q05

    Remember how everyone was making a big deal over Harris raising $81 million in 24 hours?

    Imagine that success being $19 million underwater because of AIPAC dollars:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/03/aipac-israel-spending-democratic-primaries-00144552

  • @yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    It’s kinda like whiplash to read someone who combines obvious contempt for the President and a willingness to indulge in wild conspiratorial speculation coming from the left. I was surprised again when the last paragraph frames Harris’ possible Israel policy as a question. By that point, I expected the author to explain to me what was going to happen.

    Anyway, I suppose Harris to be chillier toward Israel, but doubt she’ll usher in a sea change. Especially before November.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    “progressive””leftists” to the dance floor

  • @VanillaBean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 months ago

    It’s also time to start realizing that Israel is its own country and the US can’t control everything it does. They have their own democracy.