• @YoiksAndAway@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3315 hours ago

    Admittedly, I don’t know much about modern speedboats, but the full flip probably saved their lives. In the old days, flipping onto your head at damn near 200 mph was certain death.

    • @xploit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Yea that flip and rotation definitely saved them, you can see in the video they slow down drastically in the air while the top of the boat was pointing mostly forward, although they likely also experienced some drastic gforce changes as it happened.

        • @sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          512 hours ago

          And that is what I would describe as the only kind of miracle I believe can actually happen.

          Roughly on par with ‘bailed out of an airplane, crashed through some trees, landed in a snowbank, only suffered a few fractures and actually lived.’

          Something like that happened a few times in WW2.

            • @sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              He described the relief of seeing both people on board the boat pop open the hatch. “Oh my gosh, it’s just a miracle,” Ticknor said.

              Ticknor being the event organizer.

              https://youtube.com/watch?v=sSl2846EPl4

              The pilots suffered multiple fractures, including a broken knee.

              I’d call a broken knee alone a serious injury…

              Had their injuries been more serious, they may have been unable to escape the sinking boat.

              Had the boat landed in a different orientation, or done a different, completely undpredictable, uncontrolled aerial manuever, such that it impacted the water with more speed, the boat could have broken apart on landing or become structurally comprised much more seriously, and thus the pilots would be sinking much more rapidly, likely with more serious injuries.

              Though this boat and its safety cage performed admirably in terms of structural stability… similar crashes to this have maimed and killed a good number of folks in the history of hydroplane/powerboat events.

  • ElcaineVolta
    link
    fedilink
    2215 hours ago

    k, it’s time to wind down the whole we’re-just-burning-fossil-fuels-for-fun stuff now.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 hours ago

      Check out SailGP. It’s got some flaws, but they did actually manage to design a sailboat race that goes fast enough to actually be interesting to watch in real-time.

      flaws
      • I have my doubts that it’s as eco-friendly as they claim, since they still use fossil fuels for support boats, shipping the sailboats across the world between events, etc.
      • It’s pretty new and seems a little underfunded, so the production values and commentating can be a bit rough around the edges.
      • They try to make it accessible (e.g. by reporting speeds in kph instead of knots), but it’s still got a whiff of yacht-club elitism to it.
    • burgersc12
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 hours ago

      That time was like 30 years ago. Now we can either stop using them altogether and have a bad time, or we can keep using them and have a slightly more bad time.

  • @tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    In all seriousness, I think that there might be a good argument, in 2025, for converting races, be they car or boat or whatnot, to be remotely-driven.

    We’ve got the technology today.

    It’d permit for higher speeds and suchlike, and eliminate some requirements.

    The audience doesn’t get the drama of the driver maybe being killed in an accident, but by-and-large, blood sport has faded into history.

    There are clearly some people who watch racing for the crashes — but it’s possible to have the crashes and have vehicles potentially destroyed without the drivers being killed too.

      • @tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        315 hours ago

        Well, I suppose it depends on what people are out for. Like I said, if it’s death that they’re interested in, then, yeah, it would. But if they’re okay with the crashes without the death, then I’d think that it’d be okay.

          • @otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            614 hours ago

            If robots were racing, people would be rooting for the remote pilot, or the team that built it, or the designers of the engine, etc…

            Does no one remember Robot Wars or any spinoffs thereof?

            • @postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              514 hours ago

              Did they get NASCAR ratings?

              And those battles were a quite a bit more action than oval track racing.

              Maybe you would get figure 8 courses or mario kart tracks, but i do not believe that will keep viewers interested long term.

              • @otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                214 hours ago

                I dunno, maybe that’s true. People like watching humans be in danger, that’s true.

                Monster Truck shows probably don’t need humans though. We like watching stuff get crushed by big things even if humans aren’t involved!

          • CaptainBasculin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            414 hours ago

            Not gonna lie, a pure engineering contest without the restrictions feel like a very cool idea. See what the true limits car engineers can achieve in a race if they didn’t even need to consider driver safety. There exists a lot of restrictions on racing leagues for driver safety, as it should. But without drivers, you can pretty much throw all of it away.

            • ms.lane
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 hours ago

              But without drivers, you can pretty much throw all of it away.

              I’m not sure you could - since spectator safety is considered more important than driver safety. (both are important)

              So unless it’s out in the middle of nowhere, with no spectators, no camerapeople, any pit crew would need to be in bunkers - just drones within a few kilometers of the track - it couldn’t happen either and such and event would probably be less exciting than watching someone else play the F1 PC/Console game…

    • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      515 hours ago

      Hahahah no. Humans haven’t changed. We still love to gawk at death and pain. We just don’t want to admit it directly.

      Rubber-neckers slowing down the highway for a crash on the other side aren’t doing it to make sure they are safe. They are hoping to spot some gore.

    • @Goretantath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      213 hours ago

      If theres no risk of complete assholes burning up or crumpling into a pancake during a car race then the race sucks ass.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    315 hours ago

    I guess these guys have never heard of ground effect or air compressing at high speed.

    I’m guessing none of them want to admit to these effects if you want to keep a propeller in the water the whole time.

    • Undearius
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 hours ago

      Those effects are key to the design of these boats. They’re essentially a wing.

      Water has a lot more drag than air, so the more the boat is out of the water, the faster it can go.