• @Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1521 month ago

    Bezos makes ~$2,500 every SECOND. His big idea? Get a bunch of funding to heavily undercut local bookstores and operate at a loss while destroying local businesses such that he could take over as a near monopoly. And it’s highly doubtful that it was his idea, but it worked because when you’re willing to cheat against those not willing to do the same you’re gunna win.

    • @vala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 month ago

      Best part is Amazon can’t even manage to shop books without destroying them at this point.

  • @eletes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Here’s the math since I was curious

    1492 was 194,440 days ago * $5000 = $972,200,000

    Forbes put bezos at $209,000,000,000 for 2025

      • @jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        371 month ago

        It cracks me up that compound interest gets raised every time someone makes an argument about just how much money billionaires have. As if the only reason we’re not billionaires is because we were too dumb to invest the $5,000 we’ve been making every day since Columbus sailed the ocean blue.

          • @Septimaeus@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Compound interest when charged by lenders

            Today “compound interest” usually relates to reinvested dividends and amortized growth/appreciation of investments (e.g., stocks, bonds) simply because non-predatory loans are designed for payoff within some fixed term. So if the term “compound interest” applies, something unexpected is happening (e.g., default) and the loan will be bundled and sold at a discount to collections.

            Not far enough back to make a difference I’d wager

            I’ll take that wager! 5k daily, ignoring inflation and leap-years, compounding annually (not quarterly) at 10% annualized ROI, gives us the standard annuity formula

            1.1 * 5000 * 365 (1.1n-1) / 0.1

            where n is the number of years, which

            … in 100 years becomes ~278 billion (e11)

            … in 200 years becomes ~3.8 million billion (e15)

            … in 300 years becomes ~53 billion billion (e19)

            … in 400 years becomes ~721 thousand billion billion (e23)

            … in 533 years becomes ~231 billion billion billion (e29)

            If that sounds incredible to you, you’re not alone. It’s the result of a hyperbolic growth curve that starts slow but keeps accelerating indefinitely, and 533 years is a very long time in market terms, so you easily reach the silly-numbers range.

            Edit: the numbers before were napkin computation. I edited this to use the standard annuity formula which should be more accurate. Point should be the same though. Exponential growth is crazy.

              • @Septimaeus@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Lol you’re right! It looks like the final number I gave was only for 400 years. I didn’t actually reach 533.

                Also I was rounding numbers midway through like a pen and paper physics computation. Since that error scales exponentially, even if I had gotten to 533 the final number was guaranteed to be off.

                Update: fixed it

      • @Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        No it isn’t because it’s an imagery used to show how absurd that amount of money is. 5000 a day is easy to grasp and a few hundred years is easy to grasp.

    • I’m more interested about the 5k/d. That must be excluding compound interest. Like, all the money if just being stuffed into mattresses, or something. OTOH, having your money in a bank account might have reset you to zero in 1929.

  • @DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    641 month ago

    Conservative logic: Giving poor people a small amount of money will cause them not to work, whereas passing laws that benefit billionaires will cause them to create jobs.

  • @kuhore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    561 month ago

    If you made 7000 dollars every hour since Jesus was born, you would still not have as much money as Jeff Bezos.

    • @o1011o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      Maybe but there are also lots of people with mental illness who manage it and are still decent people. Not every sociopath is a serial killer but every billionaire is fucking evil. The decision to acquire great wealth at other’s expense and use it only for yourself is something else.

  • @58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 month ago

    It makes me think of hoarders. It just happens to be the case that money is universally sought-after, and so we think “it make money, is good!” But it’s not much different from someone with stacks of ancient newspapers filling 98% of their living space. It’s not like Jeff could actually spend all of that money even if he wanted to. He has more than he could ever need to live the most lavish and privileged of lifestyles, including giving the same to several generations of his offspring. He could still go to space and do all that crazy shit with 10% of what he has in his bank account. It can’t be normal.

  • @Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 month ago

    Bezos does not make a billion dollars in a week, unless you count certain short term gains based on random variation of the stock market, in which case he also loses a billion dollars in some weeks.

  • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    taxes or the guillotine. decapitilization or decapitation.

    I prefer the first option, but ultimately the outcome is what’s important.