• Mark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    894 days ago

    If nobody wants them… they are not worth that amount. simple economics.

    supply and demand…

    • @irish_link@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I know i would get made fun of for this but a good price is a good price. I would pay $15,000 for one. I think most people would.

      Edit 2 min later - I thought better of it. No i still wouldn’t want it. I wouldn’t trust Tesla not to hack it at some point and take it over.

      • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        244 days ago

        You could rip the batteries out of them and use them for a solar setup. The rest could be sold for scrap.

        • @DahGangalang@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Probably an unpopular opinion, but I’d love to take that as a project vehicle.

          Batteries for home setup (on TOU plan, so it’d be nice to charge when rates are low and discharge when high).
          Then slap an combustion engine in there that just acts as a power plant for the electric motors. It’d probably be biting off more than I can chew, but it sounds like a hell of a learning opportunity and tickles my engineering/tinker brain’s fancy.

          Of course, after blowing something up, I’d probably focus on dissecting the drive train and using them motors for something else. I’m suddenly curious what the suspension set up is like. If they’ve got some crazy high tech mag-ride system, I’ll bet that could be repurposed for another vehicle (pending Tesla proprietary protocols for connecting to ECU).

          But now I’m rambling. The thoughts of what I could do with those parts though.

          Ninjaedit: just took a look as some of the pondering above. I forgot how silly the interiors look, so def wouldn’t bother with attempting it as a project car.

          • @MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            43 days ago

            There are a lot of videos of the frame cracking from mild outdoor use, which instantly totals the whole vehicle.

      • @mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        yeah, for $15k USD I could buy an old Ranger or B3000 and have 5-10 years worth of fuel

        cyber truck is a hard sell

      • Bahnd Rollard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 days ago

        I would totally take one for 15k (only if its used, never from tesla itself) take the batteries out, sell those and put the frame on a truck and drive it out to an event or protest and let people smash whats left. Let people rent a sledge hammer for a bit and vent, would be a fun and very public statement. Once thats done sell it as scrap. The batteries should alone should cover the next one.

    • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 days ago

      This is exactly right. They’re worthless if nobody is willing to pay what’s being asked.

      So what they’re “worth” is nothing.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      174 days ago

      If those 5 trucks had feelings they would be hurt

          • @MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 days ago

            Try appraising real estate for a while, it’s a strong lesson in: something is worth whatever somebody is willing to pay for it. Can be higher than cost, can be lower than cost, but the willing buyer is the key to the whole valuation equation.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 days ago

              something is worth whatever somebody is willing to pay for it

              That’s a naive short-term approach to valuation.

              Real value has to be measured in some kind of revenue generation, or - at least - cost mitigation. Otherwise what you’re describing isn’t value but expense.

              the willing buyer is the key to the whole valuation equation

              The willing buyer is the key to perceived value. But suckering someone doesn’t increase the utility of what you sold them.

              • @MangoCats@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 days ago

                But suckering someone doesn’t increase the utility of what you sold them.

                No, but what someone is willing to pay is the sum total of what a business gets income from. Whether a business is delivering tangible value (say: food) or nothing of substance (say: Bitcoin) the viability of a business, it’s ability to survive and thrive in the capitalist marketplace, is 100% correlated to income willingly given vs cost of obtaining that income, and 0% correlated to “actual value delivered.”

                What shocks me about much of the U.S. economy is how much is spent on marketing, promotion, advertising, and sales. 0% value derived from such activity, but frequently over half the cost of things that are purchased in the U.S. is sunk in promotion.

                • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 days ago

                  someone is willing to pay is the sum total of what a business gets income from

                  Except credit changes the math on that significantly. You aren’t constrained by your income, but by your risk of default (and even then… glances 2008-ward) Then you can afford to buy more by paying a higher interest rate.

                  the capitalist marketplace, is 100% correlated to income willingly given vs cost of obtaining that income

                  “Willingly” is doing a lot of lifting, given the degree to which fraud, extortion, and price gouging play a roll in the national economy.

                  What shocks me about much of the U.S. economy is how much is spent on marketing, promotion, advertising, and sales. 0% value derived from such activity, but frequently over half the cost of things that are purchased in the U.S. is sunk in promotion.

                  Promotion (and deception and intimidation) drives sales. They create the illusion of scarcity and transform luxury into necessity.

                  They add perceived value among the unwitting and create implicit value through absence of harm.

    • @db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      895 days ago

      They tried that in Canada and got caught. They’ll get a free handy for doing it in the US under Tump though.

      • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        30
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        That’s what Trump’s big legal battle with New York was about - lying about the value of a penthouse or something.

        So much of these “rich” fuckers wealth is just bullshit on paper.

    • @NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 days ago

      Yup. Their boss controls the IRS. They’ll write them off, get a bailout check, and sale the remaining trucks to the US military. Triple dip the American tax payer.

  • nkat2112
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2185 days ago

    The photograph that says it all. Let’s remember Elon Musk for the Nazi that he is.

    • walden
      link
      fedilink
      English
      955 days ago

      This photo is taken out of context, though. I mean, he slapped his chest before the salute, and he did it twice in a row… Ah shit nevermind, he’s a Nazi.

    • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 days ago

      he doesnt look commited to it though, because hes doing the lip sucking thing that children do when they are unsure if they will get a bad reaction from it.

  • @Netux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    304 days ago

    $800 million worth is giving a lot of value to something they can barely give away. Maybe $800K worth of material after the cost of dismantling.

    • Lukas Murch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      224 days ago

      They really should use the number of units. If Musk cranks the price from 80k to 120k, they suddenly have $1.2B sitting there? It’s the same 10,000 ugly-ass pieces of shit.

    • @TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 days ago

      The $800m figure is only useful for figuring out how much Tesla was expecting to make out of it. When you factor in the development and manufacturing costs, they’re hemorrhaging money.

    • @Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 days ago

      Yeah, a better number would be how much it cost to build the fuckers. I’m assuming they also need ongoing maintenance while they sit around rusting.

  • @RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 days ago

    If the talk about Cybertrucks actually rusting in the rain is true, they will be worth less and less and less…

  • 74 183.84
    link
    fedilink
    English
    183 days ago

    I think its crazy that they made $800 mil worth of these cars. Who the hell thought they would sell well?

      • 74 183.84
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 days ago

        Oh its gonna be limited thats for sure. But yeah I had very similar thoughts as well. Theres one cyberfuck in my town and every time I see it I can’t help but think what a fucking goober one must be to buy it

    • @JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 days ago

      That’s 80,000 vehicles. The production capacity is 250k. Ford sold 460,000 F-150s last year.

      Chrysler had an inventory of over 1 million last year, they’ve ran through that by March.

      • @PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 days ago

        Chrysler had an inventory of over 1 million last year, they’ve ran through that by March.

        That’s insane considering Chrysler hasn’t made a decent vehicle in 20+ years and the majority of them are just as big piles of shit as the cybertruck.

    • @tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      You could definitely sell those for more than $0. The batteries alone aren’t cheap.

      • @NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        364 days ago

        So somewhere inbetween as the article says “more than 10,000 units” and “$800m” so they appear to be valuing them at ~$80k/unit which is ridiculously optimistic.

        My guess is closer to 1/3rd of that value but nobody likes to lose half a billion in the blink of an eye

      • @JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        194 days ago

        I was debating if I’d be willing to take a free cybertruck, your comment reminded me i could take it straight to the scrap yard

        • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 days ago

          A while back, I read an article by a guy who had inherited a SwastiKKKar from an uncle, including free life-time charging. He didn’t like the idea of driving a Tesla, but free was free.

          It wasn’t the reactions of others that made him throw in the towel on it, it was the poor build quality. He thought it felt cheap and rattley so he traded it in for a smokin hot Mustang. He lost a fortune over what the car was bought for, but it was free to him, so he didn’t care.

        • Match!!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          i don’t have full confidence it will make it to the scrapyard

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 days ago

      They have a lot of problems … they’re about this high … raises right hand up on the air palm down

  • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    514 days ago

    Cybertrucks are just sitting around, waiting for someone to officially label them the DeLorean of the 21st century.

    Hey! You take that back! DeLoreans were always cool cars. Their demise wasn’t due to lack of popularity, the company just had problems getting established, and ultimately didn’t survive its initial growth phase.

    Nobody despised the DeLorean, or it’s owner. They just ran out of money, and he tried a desperate Hail Mary play, that didn’t work.

    • @BlairMtnWarrior@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      264 days ago

      Their demise was absolutely due to lack of popularity. In December '81 they had produced 7,000 units and sold 3,000. I’d argue that they failed for the same reason Fiero did – they looked like a sports car but were not. Top speed was 110mph. 0-60 time was 10.5 seconds. It had a V-6 that put out 130hp in a car with a curb wt of 2700 lbs. 0-60 time was measured at 10.5 seconds. To put that in perspective, about the same as a 99 Ford F-350 Super Duty Crew Cab 4x4 Dually or 73 LTD Brougham. There are virtually no modern cars that run 0-60 that slow. A 2024 5.3l Suburban has a time of 7.0

      In addition, they had numerous quality control problems. This in a car that retailed for $25k or the rough equivalent of $86,000 in today’s dollars. While it’s probably true that nobody despised the car, it was not a good car. They were definitely cool sitting in a parking lot but getting spanked by a 1980 Chevy Citation (0-60 10.3) is not a good look

      • @wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The cybertruck is on a different scale of unpopularity.

        Nobody threw Molotov cocktails at Delorians. (Edit: or even DeLoreans)

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Now compare the gas mileage lol

          Edit - Was actually curious:

          Vehicle City Highway Combined
          DeLorean 17 23 19
          Prius 42 41 42

          I actually expected the DeLorean to be worse

          • @DahGangalang@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 days ago

            Me too. That’s comparable to my dad’s old 4 cylinder Toyota Pickup (mid-80’s, so similar era). Smaller engine and wayyyy less power so I would’ve expected the pickup to get worse than the Delorean.

      • @Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        getting spanked by a 1980 Chevy Citation (0-60 10.3) is not a good look

        [Citation needed]

    • @cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 days ago

      Their demise wasn’t due to lack of popularity, the company just had problems getting established, and ultimately didn’t survive its initial growth phase.

      Hm, I thought their demise was due to them arbitrarily going back in time.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        FUCK I accidentally hit 88mph again. I’m going to be really early to dinner…

    • FireWire400
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 days ago

      I’d fucking love to have a DeLorean; they’re bad cars but that’s where the similarities to the Cybertruck end. They’re just cool.

      • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 days ago

        Yeah, he was a larger than life character, and the end of the company was spectacular. Most companies end with a whimper, his ended with an explosion.

        I have a little personal anecdote about the end of DeLorean Motor Cars. At the end, I was living in Cleveland, OH, where DeLorean’s brother had a Cadillac dealership, which also sold DeLoreans, of course.

        When the company crashed, the government, or the bank, or the court, or somebody, was coming to take all the cars that were sitting in the factory parking lot in Detroit. The local news caught a helicopter shot of a long line of DeLoreans driving out of the lot, and down the road in a long line. They didn’t bother to follow them.

        A few days later, it was reported that all the surplus DeLoreans were missing, and DeLorean was hiding them somewhere, and they showed the footage of the cars driving off.

        A few days after that, I was taking one of my favorite shortcuts through Lakewood, the suburb where DeLorean Cadillac was located. My shortcut was a small road/alley, with far less traffic and lights, which went behind the businesses along the main road.

        One of those businesses was DeLorean Cadillac, with a big parking lot behind the dealership. I’d passed that lot many times, and it was always a mix of Caddys and DeLoreans, but this time I saw that it was FULL of nothing but DeLoreans, packed in like sardines. I had no doubt that these were the missing DeLoreans that the authorities were searching for.

        So, of course I notified the authorities where they could find the cars, right? Fuck NO. DeLorean didn’t seem like a bad guy, just a major dreamer who got desperate. I always kind of admired him. So I kept my mouth shut, and made the authorities find the cars without my help.

  • @SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    644 days ago

    I am expecting them to end up as ICE technicals, used to hunt down dissidents like…checks notes…American citizens, children, and the elderly.

      • @HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 days ago

        For all we know lots of people want them but can’t afford them.

        Paints two completely different scenarios from the same objective base observation that there are X amount of unsold Cybertrucks.

        • NoSpiritAnimal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          154 days ago

          Why is that all you know and why are you lumping us in with you?

          They’ve got ~60% more inventory than sales (6k sold).

          For comparison Rivian has 400% more sales than inventory. (14k sold).

          This should be plenty of data to conclude how popular the Cybertruck actually is.

          • @HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 days ago

            Are you comparing the same time frames? Because Rivian’s sales are down 36% for Q1 2025.

            I guess no one wants them either, or would a headline about Rivian invoke some other reason?

            That’s my point.

            • AmbiguousPropsOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Rivian didn’t over produce, and notably, didn’t go all in with the new authoritarian regime. Also, a 36% decrease in sales is much less than having $800 million (in MSRP) sitting in lots. The R1T is a very successful vehicle if you compare it to the Swastitruck.

    • @octobob@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 days ago

      Even if I could afford one, or want one, which I don’t for many reasons, the vehicle is so ginormous that it would be the biggest pain in the ass in the world to drive around my city. Parallel parking? Forget it. Narrow side streets that are the width of a car, but somehow you need to let someone come down directly towards you and it’s not a one way? Bumpy roads full of potholes or worn down to the original brick roads, with the vehicle that’s tires wear out faster than any other due to the sheer weight?

      I think you get the idea

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        so ginormous

        Tell me about it. The Cybertruck is an inch and some change longer and 8" wider than my ratty full size 1990’s pickup, yet somehow manages to have only slightly over half the usable cargo volume – 42.80 cubic feet vs. 70.7. And I’m being extremely charitable by treating the Cybertruck’s bed area as if it were cubic starting from its tallest point by the back glass, when in fact it’s wedge shaped.

        It also weighs 3269 pounds more (in its lightest configuration) and as we all know by now the Cybertruck’s towing and trailer tongue weight ratings are outright lies. Whereas millions of people have successfully lugged a combined total of billions of tons worth of boats, bikes, lawn mowers, and RV’s with GM and Ford pickups over the decades.

        Even for the use case for someone who “needs” a truck, the Wankpanzer is a moronic choice.