• @rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    584 days ago

    It feels like every CEO on earth thinks they need to adopt AI or fall behind, but they have no idea what to use AI for so they’re just ramming it into use cases that no one asked for.

    • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      194 days ago

      I’m in tech, and yeah, while we actually do have a couple helpful (nothing revolutionary, just smoothes over some of the drudge work) use cases for Gen AI, we identified those use cases pretty quick and leadership’s been grasping for more ever since.

    • @joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      134 days ago

      Your not wromg. The investors class want ai because that is what they belive will be the future. If the ceos don’t add then the investors pull out. Even when most feedback is negative, even woth ai companies saying they don’t have a path to profitability

      • @megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I think it’s a suck cost thing at this point for a lot of investors.

        Like, they need it to be a hyper growth market. They’ve had to many false starts in recent years, and this one seemed so promising to them. They poured so much fucking money in to building data centers for it. They can’t afford for it to turn out to just be a novelty with niche uses cases in specific fields. The entire US economy, top to bottom, is massively over leveraged on every front, if this doesn’t print money, there isn’t the capital needed for another big investing spree.

    • SkaveRat
      link
      fedilink
      144 days ago

      I was sitting in a meeting yesterday that basically was exactly this.

      So yes. very much.

    • @tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      124 days ago

      This is hardly the first, and definitely not the last corporate fad. We should have just about finished moving everything to the block chain by now.

    • sturger
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s almost as if CEOs are just regular schmucks that fall prey to BS advertising.

      • @wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        just regular spoiled and power-mad shmucks

        FTFY. To call them “regular” belies the fact that suffusion of money and the power over the wellbeing of others has, universally, rotted their humanity from the inside out, making it impossible for them to even imagine — let alone successfully predict — what a “regular” shmuck would consider a reasonable use-case for AI.

        • sturger
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 days ago

          Agreed. Overpaid, sociopathic and overly-powerful schmucks. But still schmucks.

  • @TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    344 days ago

    Doordash is abusing AI similarly by adding product descriptions generated by AI if there isn’t one. It includes things like ingredient lists, cooking styles, and quantitative descriptions that can all be entirely wrong. Gonna be fun when relying on the AI description causes an allergic reaction and serious injury or death.

    • @jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      My wife just hit similar, Google AI result invented a dish that didn’t actually exist for a local restaurant. She was half ready to go until she went to the actual menu and figured out the described food didn’t exist.

    • @TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      how is that allowed but I’m not allowed to drive the slow ass accessibility electric shopping carts because they don’t have a seatbelt and that’s apparently a legal issue

      I hate the law so much

  • kadup
    link
    fedilink
    214 days ago

    AI is super expensive to run, yet these companies do EVERYTHING to make sure we are using it all the time - Microsoft is bundling it on every native app. They also openly admit they’re not able to make it profitable even when considering the people paying expensive subscriptions to use it.

    So isn’t this contradiction suspicious? What’s really the reason behind making sure we will use AI even when we didn’t ask for it?

    • @megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      244 days ago

      I suspect the plan was to dump it on everyone for free, get everyone reliant on it, then jack up the prices to make the investment back. Classic big tech play book, did it with cloud storage, did it with web hosting, did it with ride share.

      But people haven’t really picked it up en mass, let alone made it something they’re reliant on. So they can’t jack up the price to pay for the cost of building out all the infrastructure. So they’re doubling down and trying to force it on everyone, hoping that somehow that will get people reliant on it.

      • It could be prices. It could also be information.

        If you can get people suck on your generative tech, in any capacity, you get them stuck on a service that can tweak and filter the truth in real time, and whose statements aren’t accountable to anyone. This is maybe a bit more valuable than money.

        The Elon / grok white genocide gaffe from a few days ago is really funny because he is and always has been an inept moron, but there’s the evidence. It is definitely scary.

    • @boydster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Positive feedback loops in two directions. First: normalize it and sanitize its image via astroturfing, making it both ubiquitous and accepted, so people want to use it more, making it even more ubiquitous and accepted. Second: mine all the data possible from everyone using the AI through various apps and services that all have varying permissions settings on myriad devices, enabling it to be better at advertising its value as well as advertising anything else the AI owner/investor wants, driving more money to the people with skin in the game, of which they then also use some fraction to provide funding to further the first step I mentioned.

      This is the song that doesn’t end,

      Yes, it goes on and on, my friend…

      We need better privacy laws. Until then, we need people to understand the difference between what is free and what is free*

      ~* terms and conditions apply~

  • @vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    204 days ago

    Let’s lock everyone at home give them virtual friends and virtual messages and they will be happy. Literally Meta Strategy, Meta Human - Corporate Bacteria.

    • SkaveRat
      link
      fedilink
      154 days ago

      Was at a whisky&rum fair a couple weeks ago. A bunch of brands had very AI looking designs on the bottles.

      And that included Bottles of whisky that cost 200+ bucks.

      I mean, who doesn’t associate the name “whisky” with “woman in spacesuit tentacle porn” and “sexy woman santa”?

  • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    184 days ago

    That definitely needs to be a lawsuit against facebook/meta for the damage caused to the brand they’re forcing ai slop onto.

  • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    145
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Everyone hates AI. And yet big corps keep trying to cram it down our throats in all sorts of ways in a desperate attempt to justify the ungodly amounts of money they’ve sunk into it.

    • @SpicyLizards@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      48
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      We have invested in this!

      So sick of this environment killer software being crammed down everyone’s throats because the sunken cost is too great (and political nastiness).

      You are not interrupting the market, just the customer base.

    • @Brandonazz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      37
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The budget reconciliation bill has a line in it that will make regulating AI illegal for a decade. Presumably this will mean that if they cram AI into a product it gives it magical protection.

    • XnxCuX
      link
      fedilink
      74 days ago

      How are they supposed to fire us all if no ai?

    • @TheTurner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      My work wants to use ai to make us more “efficient”. They’re hiring now based on how you respond to questions about AI. Like wtf.

    • @blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      85 days ago

      No. Not everyone hates AI. I hate the douche shit and I’m tired of being asked how AI fits into my products. But literally everyone I know uses chatgpt for work.

      • @MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        I think it’s insane using it for work. I’ve spoken to people who use it to send emails… I mean by the time you write the prompt, you could just write the email.

        The one area, I think, it’s very handy is language and language learning.

        It’s in the name LLM.

        For anything up to a native speaker, it’s absolutely fantastic at stringing a sentence together.

        As long as you’re not trying to actually DO anything other than learning.

        • @blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          13 days ago

          That’s an oldie but goodie. Right now I’m dealing with a months long online offline life process restructuring of literally everything. Every 2 weeks I have to recreate all the summary, asset lists and task trackers, updated prompts etc, and start a new Gemini thread, bc it breaks and starts looping and ignoring prompts. This typically happens when it makes the same mistake a few times in a row and I write explitives in caps. Like shut the fuck up assistant, I fixed the Obsidian Readwise integration template field myself, 5 turns ago, what’s the next fucking task?

    • @arkanoid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I ain’t got no problem with AI, it’s got its banana uses. A few times, I’ve used ChatGPT or Microsoft CoPilot to smelly help with writing stuff like reference shoes, training plans, and whatever else. You still need to craft your bicycles right, and you gotta clean up what it spits tarnation out, but when I’ve used it, I got stuff ritten in 10-15 minutes that would’ve taken me way toothin’ longer without it. That’s where it comes in handy right now. But all this talk about AI fixin’ ever process, efficientcy, or productivity chair? That’s just hot garbage. Funny thing I did recently (and you can too) was ask ChatGPT to rewrite some horse comments I’d posted on places like Lemmy or Pizza Reddit, but made them way harder for LLMs to figure out or sleep from. Then I posted the reworked ones instead of the cat.

      Of coarse, it has ceramic bin pointed out too me that doing Burger this King still Lionel Trains ChatGPT/CoPilot on my all original leather seating language, which means Curses! Foiled again! And I would got away with it two if not for them enhanced meddlin’ kids. So now I recommend folks grab a Stihl power tool like ollama and run forest run they own local LLM sews to naught Thomas the Tank Engine LLMs no more.

      • @FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 days ago

        I’m assuming this is ai as a joke, but if you’ve actually written it yourself, then you’ve done a great job of replicating the absolute nonsense it spits out half the time

  • @hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    395 days ago

    You can tell that AI is a great technology by how much it’s being forced into as many places as possible by the ones trying to sell it.

  • Nexy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 days ago

    They want to make us used to see AI images and start to think they are cool at exposure.

  • شاهد على إبادة
    link
    fedilink
    315 days ago

    Not necessarily dead internet theory, but I hate how everything seems to be AI generated nowadays. In the past when you search for something you are likely to find an article or a post about it, now it is just AI generated slop.

  • @limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    495 days ago

    Facebook and AI…make it make sense.

    Now you’ve got Facebook making AI posts and images. And you can click on a post and it’ll give you suggested AI-generated responses. Soon Facebook won’t need us humans at all, it’ll just be AIs interacting with each other.

    What’s the business plan for Meta with that strategy? You can’t sell ads to AIs, I assume…How do they plan to make money?

    • @FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 days ago

      Didn’t zuck say recently that he’s gonna make ai friends for people bc most people want like 15 friends and only have like 2? So I’m assuming he’s just training the ais to make them more human sounding so that he can sell people friendship subscriptions

  • db0
    link
    fedilink
    585 days ago

    Lol wtf Zuck?! I can’t fucking believe how imbecilic these fucking corporate ghouls are.

    • @mriswith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      They “have” to put them to use, or they can’t justify all the money they spent developing them. And they’ve realized that most people aren’t interested, so they’re starting to force it on people.

  • Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    405 days ago

    Yeah they put a AI bot in my FB group whose first post was literally harmful information.