• @DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    On the one hand, it’s about time - APT was released in 1998, and it wasn’t even the first package manager.

    On the other hand, I’m sure Microsoft will find a way to make it shit.

    • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1322 days ago

      You’re talking just package managers? Winget has existed for about 5 years. Not to mention the many third party package managers like chocolatey and appget.

      • @JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        622 days ago

        But winget is still somewhat hacky, this would make use of the actual system updates system and be opt in for better integration

          • @JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            222 days ago

            I only speak from trying to use it as a package manager, it’s reliant on people making custom silent install scripts and updating packages correctly. I had some apps that didn’t have their version updated in some file so it always reported being out of date to Winget so it was always downloading and reinstalling. Just janky primarily with third party apps.

    • @ogeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2623 days ago

      No no no, you see, you have One Note and One Note for Windows 10, so you can, you know, use it in Windows 10… I mean yes you can install One Note but One Note for Windows 10 is better integrated with Outlook but the one thats already installed.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4223 days ago

    If you could only be arsed to implement the Windows/Microsoft Store well enough to support this use case 13 years ago many of us wouldn’t be Linux comrades today. 😂

  • @pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3923 days ago

    As any current or former Windows admin will know - they can barely handle Windows OS updates without breaking something major every other month.

    I mean on the one hand it would be good to do away with all the duplicated efforts of in-app automatic updaters and app ‘agents’ that tie up background resources. But colour me jaded, i think this will just be a walled garden that app developers have to pay to opt into, and will mean users lose control over which apps they trust to update without thinking, and which they selectively update after a ‘hmm i better just check they didnt cause any major bugs’ search. A new revenue stream for MS is the primary goal.

    • @WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1523 days ago

      Switching the PC off when it was updating in the background and now the application will never run again on that PC, but continue to hold a license that can only be revoked from the application itself. Running out of hard disk because it for some reason fails to update the application and is now busy downloading it again for attempt #73, of course without cleaning up anything because that only happens after a successful update. Blocking applications daily or weekly because of updates, and of course you urgently need them now.

  • @eekrano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1923 days ago

    Didn’t they just announce they’re getting rid of drivers being part of Windows update? They couldn’t handle drivers, but want to handle ALL apps? Surely that’ll go well.

  • FiveMacs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1023 days ago

    I can’t even trust microshit to let me plug a monitor in with their crap thinking it’s a fucking speaker and changing all my defaults…

    Nothing good will come from this lol

        • @the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1222 days ago

          I agree. My point stands, though. You, a Linux user, believes it is bad that windows plans to handle updates the same way Linux does. That is very weird to me.

          • @Cort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            windows plans to handle updates the same way Linux does

            Windows will have snaps and flatpacks and user repo packages that all update separately using separate update utilities, which are themselves separate from the package manager for the general OS?

          • @WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            222 days ago

            windows update is known to force updates down your throat, even when it is just not appropriate right now. that’s not how things work on linux.

    • @thequickben@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 days ago

      Would you though? Many people say the same thing but here we are. Windows is still dominant in spite of all its failings.

  • Libra00
    link
    fedilink
    English
    823 days ago

    And I want Windows and all its bullshit to heck off!

    Fortunately I’m winning that one so far.

    PRETTY_NAME="Nobara Linux 42 (KDE Plasma Desktop Edition)"

    • Lka1988
      link
      fedilink
      English
      923 days ago

      Linux has been doing this for decades via APT and other software managers. Not locked down, either.