Here’s a rare sight: a CEO of a large company has spoken out in support of remote work for employees, slamming those firms that drag staff back into the office against their will. Dropbox boss Drew Houston compared RTO mandates to trying to force people back into malls and movie theaters.
Speaking on an episode of Fortune’s “Leadership Next” podcast, Houston said what most people have long thought: that returning to the office is a waste of time and money when employees can do exactly the same tasks at home.
“We can be a lot less dumb than forcing people back into a car three days a week or whatever, to literally be back on the same Zoom meeting they would have been at home,” he said. “There’s a better way to do this.”
I am in a situation where the return to office was a 6k decrease in wages.
Personally I wouldn’t want to work in an office where (almost) everybody is remote. I believe that the best option is to do a hybrid.
Edit: I prefer working with others in person instead of doing it remotely over the phone or teams. Not sure if I am more productive at work or at home due to the distractions at home. But I am in the minority it seems, but then again my commute is about my rewind time so I am refreshed when I am at home. Traffic isn’t an issue either and I can bike if I wish (and didn’t sweat as much)
Not sure if I am more productive at work or at home due to the distractions at home
Everyone I know is more productive at home, office is all the time coffee breaks, deciding where to go for lunch, then going to lunch, then another coffee break, smoke break, etc
There are specific things that are more efficient in person, mostly meetings with multiple people.
It’s easier to interject and the conversation flows better in person.
With zoom and the like you get to to the “no you go ahead” loops when people talk over each other.
Everything else is just fine remote.
"Where to go for lunch, you go out lunching everyday? We just bring our own lunch.
But yes I am generally less productive at home because I am inclined to do other shit while at work and considering I have to write hours on customers I cannot get away with working 5 hours and writting 8 hours (that’s also illegal, but okay)
Dropbox were really smart and went for it early, they closed offices completely and sent plenty of workers to full remote. Savong money for the company on office rent, and money and time for the workers.
they saw the profit in it. most of the other companies wernt doing it because: ceo, managment love to have power over the lowly worker, + govt tax benefits, business from commuters
I would still go to a mall if they didn’t have overstock on slim fit clothing. I would also go to the theater more if they had reasonable pricing and actually showed movies I want to watch. There’s nothing wrong with either of these things, it’s just that capitalism has yet again, ruined them to appease the 1%.
RTO is either companies looking for a way to cut jobs or a way to utilize their commercial real estate.
I also want to think it’s a little bit the management/CEOs who think their employees are their friends who get lonely realizing the stripper doesn’t actually love them. Meanwhile they refuse to develop a personality or real friendships.
I didn’t think that managers like Michael Scott actually existed.
Step 1: Create one of the greatest tools in human history, one of the benefits being that it can allow a ton of people to work from home, increasing their quality of life, reducing traffic, and improving air pollution.
Step 2: Get forced to experience a worldwide pandemic in which we are made to utilize this tool for such a function so we can see that it actually works as intended.
Step 3: Ignore all that for the profit of the few, to the detriment of the many.
Humans = Trash
RTO is just posturing to share holders.
“Look, look, we’re treating our staff badly, so you know we’re a good investment!”
Hm, I don’t think that’s likely. I have some other tinfoil hat theories:
- it’s so that they can watch their workers to make sure they’re working;
- it’s to ensure the workers don’t have other commitments outside work (like looking after a kid);
- people who are board members of both real estate businesses and RTO companies.
I would qualify your first point. Parkinson’s Law tells us that we have pointless bosses in huge numbers, and they need to justify their own existence. The people who actually produce things, everyone can see if they’re working or not by looking at the output. But their supervisors, and especially their supervisors’ supervisors, those people are desperate to make themselves relevant, to justify their pointlessly-large salaries despite a complete lack of utility.
- that is true, but they love to do it to stroke thier own ego.
It’s actually:
- To ensure the corporate real estate market doesn’t collapse like the the consumer real estate market did in 2008 despite the same problem with massive loan fraud inflating the value of business real-estate for toxic bank loans that are rated AAA, but are actually worth shit as no one needs corporate real estate post - Covid.
It’s the 2008 housing crisis, but with corporate real estate. COVID forced work from home, which caught banks with their pants down, having no way to actually drive the demand back up for these buildings that will continually house less and less people from less and less businesses (Work from home + businesses not surviving Covid, now Tariffs.)
Our entire banking system is backed up by debt packaged with corporate real estate that’s rated as AAA, but is just more toxic cat shit no one wants wrapped in dogshit that banks need. It’s a bomb that’s been growing as giant corporate buildings become ghost towns, and city centers become more horizontal than verticle.
Big companies with big loans from banks know they’re fucked if the corporate real estate market collapses. So they force work from home as a band aid that gives their corporate property some value, or at least justifies it on paper. In reality, the cost to force workers into the office always offsets the billions in losses if their corporate office real estate ever followed real market forces and depreciated in value.
I still don’t understand how this talking point makes sense. So businesses are purposefully incurring costs to prop up an industry that they’re not involved in? A business will stop leasing a building and save money if they can, hell mine did.
Lots of Fortune 500 companies own buildings and both they and their executives have big investments in commercial real estate. They don’t want the market to collapse because it’ll hurt them all personally.
See my other comment in this thread.
Companies Renting offices are usually not pushing for RTO. Definitely not full time RTO.
Lots of businesses own their offices. Those buildings are assets on the company balance sheet. If no-one uses those offices they become worthless and the company visibly loses money.
Wouldn’t those businesses that own their offices still prefer to sell or rent a property if the business will run without it? Artificially filling a property with employees to “make use of” the property rather than get money out of it is a good way to be left holding the bag when other companies ditch their properties to save money and crash the market anyway. To your point, the property is still the same asset whether employees are in it or not; it costs money. I guess I’m not really buying the notion that businesses are banding together to lose money for the greater good of the business real estate market. The same companies that won’t even invest in obvious long-term profitability plans? Really?
That is a lot of it. Companies with office assets don’t want to be left holding the bag. They have sunk costs (x year leases) and there are some benefits to the business of people being presentatial, so from the employers PoV everyone should return until the lease expires.
If they own the property then not having it fully used means that it will sell for less when they are finally able to do so.
Some jobs also need a proportion of the workforce to be present, so hybrid becomes the best balance for them.
So many Boomers have proven incapable of remote Mgmt. If they don’t have staff in line-of-sight, they always seem to default to “they’re not working hard,” regardless of actual productivity.
Boomers need to retire already and remove themselves from their perches at the top of corporate ladders.
You decided to blame the old people instead of … checks notes … the rich people. That was a bizarre choice. Meh.
Disappointed to see ageism here. Boomers get such hate even though they invented gay people and music. My last remote manager was a millenial, he sucked.
Oh please. Boomers as a cohort have earned the enmity. They stole the economic welfare of their children and children’s children while hoarding resources and lavishing themselves at every turn. Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z have all been sacrificed on the altar of Boomer prosperity. All the while, they made sure that the ladders they used to gain a foothold in upward mobility were immediately pulled up afterwards.
The last 40 years of decline is directly attributable to the choices and votes of Boomers, who, because of their enormous population size, have had an outsized influence on all aspects of American development.
Right … except for all of the poor Boomers out there … let’s just forget about them. Let’s forget about all the Boomers who tried very hard to stop the wealth shift to the rich. They don’t count; they don’t exist.
If you’ll excuse some whataboutism, I feel like Gen X-Z are all doing the exact same thing. In Canada, the conservative party is propped up on gen Z voters. (Americans, please note that blue=conservative party.)
Edit: downvoters apparently don’t believe me. 338 poll.
OK Boomer.
I had to.
Don’t you dare call me a boomer, I would never be that old in a million years. I’m incensed.
And who taught him to be that way? That’s right, boomer parents
Dropbox seems to be different than other companies. It is known to have migrated back from AWS to their own infrastructure at a time when ever other CEO was propagating to migrate into the cloud. Article is from 2019, though: https://techcrunch.com/2019/06/21/three-years-after-moving-off-aws-dropbox-infrastructure-continues-to-evolve/
I’ve been yelling at that AWS cloud ever since they started becoming the standard for enterprise. Glad to see sanity prevails somewhere anyway
Commercial.
Real Estate.
I am not 100% sure of the physical footprint of office space per employee of DropBox in comparison to other highly computerized companies, but…
…in addition to the just subborn nature of a useless management class at many companies realizing they are basically useless and don’t deserve to be paid a wage, because their workers can work just as well, or better, with far, far less ‘oversight’ from them…
Fucking real estate.
The C Suite knows that if they allow remote work to become normalized, then all their fancy office buildings are worth far less than they otherwise would be, and that then they’d go tits up, underwater, on all their various kinds of financing they’ve got on them.
Instead of managing a transition to a new paradigm in a sensible and controlled manner, that would allow them to gradually unwind from the RE, from the offices themselves… which could be done over time via the cost savings and increased efficiency from remote work, and laying off (restructuring, whatever) most of their managers… nope, they’ve almost all decided that that cannot be allowed.
It’s exactly this, 1000%. I work for a small company that had a return-to-office mandate a few years ago when Covid began initially winding down as access to vaccines became widespread. I was working fully remote and had leased an apartment over an hour away from the closest branch office in an affordable part of town. We had our most profitable year ever in the nearly 50 year history of the company in 2020 when literally every employee was working remote. Morale was up, I was saving money that wasn’t going to gas or car maintenance, and I was feeling positive about the future of work-life balance.
Then, one day, I get called in for performance review, and it was all smiles and sunshine and then they said “You’re doing a great job Furbag, but we’d like to see you back in the office for a minimum of three days per week.” That was the first and only negative comment I had ever received on a performance review since starting for the company. When I escalated the results of my performance review to management, wanting a more clear explanation for why I am being asked to commute 1+ hours in to work almost every day from the outskirts of the bay area, they told me exactly what you said “We’re paying for this building, so we want people physically in the office to justify it. Also, every other industry is doing return to work mandates so this shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.”
Naturally, this is still a sore spot for me. The company didn’t learn it’s lesson and still follows industry trends like little lemmings (and not the good kind that post here) while looking into buying up more real estate in other parts of the state to expand operations. They could be selling the building I’m working in now, and use the profits from the sale to fund everybody with equipment to work from home (desk, chair, monitors, hardware, etc) and work would continue as usual with a lot more employee satisfaction and work-life balance, but I’ve learned that owning real estate as a business is in itself a prestige that the C-Suite loves to show off to it’s competitors. “Look at this historic building we own, isn’t it grand?”, “Oh, you think that’s grand? We rent 12 floors of a 40 story skyscraper in San Francisco, beat that!”.
Managers need the physical locations to continue to exist so that they can justify their own existence, and they’ve fully convinced gullible CEOs that productivity will wane if people are allowed to do work from home “unsupervised”, even though there’s plenty of data that suggests the opposite is true.
/endrant
Yep, your personal anecdote illustrates broad cultural tendencies of the American managerial and owner class.
Office space and location is the same as buying a lambo.
Its peacocking, its dick waving.
They very rarely care about running a business well.
They care about being better than, wealthier than, more powerful than other people.
If anyone needs a refresher, go watch American Psycho again.
As another commenter once pointed out when I said something similar:
Same exact shit, just worse fitting suits and slightly better haircuts these days.
I agree with most of this except for the manager piece. Most of my managing is over Teams or the phone. Doesn’t matter where I am.
But of course, I’m just a worthless manager taking up resources so take what I say with a grain of salt.
I think people tend to overly generalize to “managers” when they really mean the middle 3-4 of 6-9 layers of management or something.
E.g. the reporting chain from our company’s CEO all the way down to me (an “individual contributor”) has 7 people between us. The most change, and with the least noticeable effect on the work I actually do, happens around layers 4 to 6 above me
Sounds like you need to start a new company. Out compete the dinosaurs and drive them into bankruptcy.
they don’t want to unwind from RE if they are board members on RE companies as well as the RTO-mandate company. We should never have allowed people to be board members in two busineses.
We should never have allowed people to be board members in two busineses.
Ding ding ding!
Correct!
But then we couldn’t capitalism as hard, so… I’m sorry but that issue is a political non-starter.
… Where I grew up, literally every single city council board member just also ran a real estate holding company at the same time.
I figured out as a literal child that this was why our local government only made nonsensical spending and taxing decisions, its the definition of corrupt, but everyone acted like I was insane.
Oh well, we’re all renters now, good job to all the people who kept voting for actual landlords to run the government.
Lemme fix that verb:
“Dropbox ceo decries defunct despots denying workers their work from home rights”
Seriously can we stop with “slam” though
Please don’t replace it with alliteration.
I love alliteration. And puns, especially the multilingual kind 👹
RTO is now just a tactic to force people to quit.
The jargon you’re looking for is a stealth layoff
They should rebrand the stupid “quiet quitting” as “quiet layoffs”
Capital beat Labour to death 40 years ago but can’t get enough of the taste of victory and they keep digging up the rotten corpse of the Workers to screw it some more.
say it with me: GET OVER IT CORPOS, MEATSPACE IS DEPRECATED.
Sounds like somebody doesn’t own any commercial real estate.
or tax benefits for hiring x amount employees, plus govts also dont want WFH, because then they wouldnt get tax revenue from cars, roads, businesses.
Rare to see a CEO saying something sensible I agree with.
I’d love to see labor organize so when management is like “come into the office” they can be like “no”. Let management try to do anything by themselves. They can’t. Labor has untapped power.
