• @FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1387 days ago

      The oath clearly states you’ll follow legal orders of the officers above you. I would like to think when I was in the military I would refuse to follow these illegal orders. In reality I have no idea what I would do. It would be a long legal battle and potentially life ruining event to do the right thing.

      • @treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        817 days ago

        Soldiers aren’t lawyers either. So you’d have to be super confident in your knowledge of the law to risk discharge or imprisonment.

        • @FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Yeah, for most things. But when it comes to fighting your own citizens, it feels pretty cut and dry. But again, this is easy for me to say now that I’m not wearing the uniform anymore.

          • @k0e3@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            106 days ago

            I appreciate your honesty. People make it sound so easy to do the right thing but when you’re in a group like the military where conformity is pretty much a matter of life and death, it’s like a very hard decision to make.

        • @Guidy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          216 days ago

          The USMC has a chain of command whose job it is to know this shit. They let those Marines down and have stained the honor of the Corps.

          The writing has been on the wall since at least last February or whenever it was trump replaced so much of the DoD top brass. This was always what - in his first term he tried to send troops to Oregon and the DoD correctly told him “no”. Those people are replaced with scum who don’t mind violating the Posse Comitatus Act.

        • @fodor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          15 days ago

          If they are acting illegally, they could in theory face state charges for assault and battery. In theory. Because they have no arrest powers. Maybe. Right? That’s the tricky point.

          So they would have to be super confident to not find out the scope of their authority.

      • @Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        427 days ago

        Thank you for being honest about it. A different thread over the same topic people were saying it’s very simple and military should be able to easily disobey these illegal orders. Reality is much different. I know it’s very scary to potentially throw your life away to do the right thing and no one can truly say what they would do in this type of situation without actually living it.

        • @FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          297 days ago

          Yeah, you’re talking about potentially getting a dishonorable discharge making it super hard to get another good job and potentially going to military prison. It’s an insanely hard situation to be in. The guilt you’ll live with for following orders or having life long economic ruin. I’m just so glad I’m not in the military anymore.

      • Capt. Wolf
        link
        fedilink
        137 days ago

        “Be a good little crayon eater, maggot, and do as you’re told unless you want to end up in there with them.” -Commanding officer, probably

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 days ago

        I mean the oath is to defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic and then gets into obeying orders.

      • @dutchkimble@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        25 days ago

        In my country there’s a thing called court martial. I guess it’s the same in the US. So if a soldier disobeys it’ll probably be that.

        • @FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 days ago

          Yep, exactly the same. The military has its own set of laws called the Uniform Code of Military Justice. You can be court martialed for breaking the UCMJ.

    • jawa22
      link
      fedilink
      176 days ago

      OK. This needs to be said. Not every 2A adherant is a magat or a republican. There are many of us actual leftists that are armed and getting ready to actually fight this shit. The NRA != every armed American, and the time for leftists failing to be armed is long gone. Dems have been fighting against an actual armed left for decades because they love their capitalism. It is time to mobilize for real.

    • cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 days ago

      Everybody in the US is technically a 2nd amendment person. what are you waiting for?

  • Guy6758
    link
    fedilink
    English
    977 days ago

    Oh hey look more blatantly illegal shit from orange leader

  • partial_accumen
    link
    fedilink
    407 days ago

    “Any temporary detention ends immediately when the individual(s) can be safely transferred to the custody of appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel,” a spokesperson said.

    Coming soon:

    “Day 3650, we’ll transfer you to an appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel soon, prisoner.”

    • @m4xie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They can’t perform arrests. They can only temporarily detain them with zip ties and transfer them by van to the police station.

      • partial_accumen
        link
        fedilink
        36 days ago

        What is their documented legal definition of the length of “temporarily detain”?

        • Depending on the state, you may detain someone in the process of a crime until law enforcement can take them. I know in Texas, civilian arrest powers are very similar to police.

          Being active military throws a huge wrench in this, however, as well as being ordered to a place and deployed with the purpose of policing. You can’t just throw up a “this is federal property” defense, because this is also a public building.

    • @Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      157 days ago

      I read the article. He crossed a yellow taped off area of the building perimeter.

      He was a vet headed into the building for some reason and the marines stopped him, detained, turned over, and he was then released.

      The guy didn’t seem to phased by it. Overall I’d give it a 5/7.

  • who
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “They’re just doing their job,” said Leao,

    No, Marcos, I don’t think they are.

    • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      287 days ago

      Troops who invade our country and do violence to our people are our enemy, no matter what flag they fly or uniform they wear. Fuck these scum.

    • @mhague@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25 days ago

      I can’t stop thinking of the contrast between charged-up Americans willing to fight, kill, and die in a shitty battlefield for our freedoms but when our freedoms are being destroyed as the main attraction these guys are nowhere.

  • @wulrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    75 days ago

    What would happen if someone were to detain a group of marines (with the minimal force necessary), in the wrong assumption - honest mistake - that they were about to execute illegal orders?

    • @silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      45 days ago

      They’re trained and equipped in a way that you are not. I do not expect this to succeed unless you’ve already convinced them that they want to surrender.

      • While they have the physical ability to resist, they don’t have the legal right. They are subject to the same laws as anyone in the US.

        In fact, they might be commanded to stand down and accept it, because the legal implications of acting like an occupying force would have long term, very bad effects for the existence of the marines.

        While that might sound far fetched, the marine corps is smart, and would allow a few soldiers to face some humiliation and risk the government that funds them thinking “what if that was my kids?”

        • @silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          15 days ago

          They’re deployed in the hope of producing a massacre that can be blamed on the victims. I do not recommend counting on their leadership ordering a surrender

  • @Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    267 days ago

    Reuters images showed Marines apprehending a civilian, restraining his hands with zip ties and then handing him over to civilians from the Department of Homeland Security.

    Asked about the incident, the U.S. military’s Northern Command spokesperson said active duty forces “may temporarily detain an individual in specific circumstances.”

    “Any temporary detention ends immediately when the individual(s) can be safely transferred to the custody of appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel,” a spokesperson said.

    • kersploosh
      link
      fedilink
      207 days ago

      That was my first thought. Where are all the self-described Libertarians who should be losing their shit over this? They should be in the street screaming “posse comitatus!” at the tops of their lungs.

  • @motor_spirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I hope they ultimately meet a similar fate or find early graves rather than act as traitors. Rest in piss redneck trash, there’s no honor or valor involved.

    “Just doing their job” I hope somebody tells them the same while disappearing them to somewhere I won’t give a flying fuck about. May your partners be slutted out and your children die before you.