• @Enfors@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 days ago

    Is it legal in the US to shoot people who are trying to kidnap you?

    I mean, anyone can go around claiming to be law enforcement or ICE or whatever, but with no badge or ID, how are people supposed to know that this isn’t a gang trying to trafic them?

  • @shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I would say the US has an executive with aspirations to implement aspects of a fascist state. As long as millions of people are protesting in the streets, the courts are ruling against the executive on points of law and people are standing their ground it is still a long road for the executive to get where they want to go. If the country really was full fascist you would be totally fucked and being shipped with your family to a concentration camp for disloyalty to great leader right now.

    Unlike some other countries where law enforcement and prisons might be state run on principle, the US has a history of privatizing such functions. They had the union busting Pinkerton thugs, for profit prisons and bounty hunters. A society that didn’t cry out when the Pinkertons were busting the heads of working people or kids were being railroaded into for profit prison slavery shouldn’t be surprised when thugs are clearing the streets of immigrants. That is just America sadly. That nastiness has always been there.

  • Doom
    link
    fedilink
    152 days ago

    Cracks me the fuck up the rest of the world thinks this now.

    This has been the case since Bush passed Citizens United and it was even happening before that. RIP Rosenbergs.

      • Doom
        link
        fedilink
        22 days ago

        It happened during the Obama administration but it was in response to shit under Bush from people being critical of him/his admin. Obama did not support Citizens United.

  • @Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    172 days ago

    It’s called “disappearing someone” and it was something that was supposedly done by dictators and tyrants.

  • @jimjam5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    32 days ago

    For Texas at least, under penal code 9.31(a)(1-3) it’s presumed to be reasonable self defense to use force (it specifically does not mention what kind of force, but it is assumed that deadly force is included, I think) against a person who “was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery.”

  • @WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 days ago

    Are people in denial? It just seems like a commonly understood thing. I’ve talked to straight CNN consuming boomers and even they see it for what it is.

    For the record I’m in Canada so maybe it’s just hard to see from the inside.

    • DaftyduxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 days ago

      If they aren’t in the streets they are in denial

  • Hazel
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Is your goal that we should just… not say this is illegal? Not argue that it’s not okay? Literally fold and accept fascism?

    Because that seems to be the narrative you’re pushing, which is the polar opposite of constructive in this situation.

    Super weird and suspect that every thread seems to be full of people saying this is normal. That this is just how it is, that it’s been going on forever, and that anyone who has an issue with it is being unrealistic. Really, really weird. Almost like they’re cryptofascists.

    HMMMMMMMM.

      • Hazel
        link
        fedilink
        123 hours ago

        Maybe I’m misunderstanding the context of the image. Are you agreeing with the people in the image or saying they’re in denial by acting as though ICE should be held to the law?

        • DaftyduxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Im just trying to rile up anti-trump sentiment, so which ever makes you more upset I guess.

  • @Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    142 days ago

    What may have been the largest organized protests in American history were just a few days back, the president has record-breakingly low approval, even his own party’s talking heads are turning against him. If you’re not going to be satisfied by anything short of armed uprising then at least be brave enough to say as much, but pretending that Americans just don’t see anything wrong and aren’t doing anything is an act of wilful and blatant ignorance.

    • DaftyduxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t rest on your laurels just yet. You’ll know when you’ve begun to turn the tide because the beast will lash out. The restraint we are seeing right now just means they’ve got a whole lot more in the tank.

      You dont have to look further than last October to see this same type of hubris play out. Kamala had momentum and there was 100% a point where if the vote happend then she would have won. For what ever reason they backed off on the “weird” stuff and started rolling out the neocons. The DNC is going to fuck you and you wont even see it coming.

      • @Red_October@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        82 days ago

        You’re only proving that you don’t actually have any idea what’s going on here, acting like we’re resting on our laurels because there was a big protest. Nobody here is thinking “Yeah we made ourselves heard, job’s done!” Nobody here says the fight is won, but you’re out here acting like nothing is being done at all.

        • DaftyduxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          No. Im pushing like I’ve been pushing for the las 8 years. Grow up.

  • ssillyssadass
    link
    fedilink
    122 days ago

    There’s gotta be criminals non-ICE who exploit this. Like it must be so easy now for ransomers to kidnap somebody.

  • Cadenza
    link
    fedilink
    223 days ago

    I mean America is a fascist regime. And you know who support fascism? Fascists. So I guess most fascists are kinda OK with what’s happening.

    That’s not denial, that’s full endorsement.

      • Cadenza
        link
        fedilink
        42 days ago

        I wonder what chain of thought led you to this conclusion, which is very strange to me. But at the same time, I’m not willing to start some kind of futile quarell over this so… well, have it your way and have a good day.

    • DaftyduxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This argument will just give the fascist leverage to call you a fascist. They are pros at projection and sadly you dont stand a chance.

      • @CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 days ago

        The issue is fascists are going to lie regardless. There is nothing we can say, no way we can act that will prevent that. It is pointless to try.

        • DaftyduxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Not asking that we try to confront the fascist populous. Asking we confront the fascist government.

            • DaftyduxOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              The op was saying americans are fascist so it makes sense the government is fascist. To claim the general populace is fascist will only get you in a shouting match of who the most fascist is. A distraction from what really matters, addressing the fascist regime occupying the white house.

        • DaftyduxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          Apparently not because they keep doing it and are effective in their propaganda when they have no right to be.

  • @Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    273 days ago

    Generally people in America don’t get organized until there’s a disaster. That’s one of the lessons of the Great Depression/New Deal. Not the most optimal way to maintain democracy. It’s not really “maintenance” if you wait for the thing to break and then fix it.

    • @cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 days ago

      That’s a pretty classic Marxist understanding of how class conflict actually happens. In response to a crisis a state can either adapt or fall into chaos if it can’t. That’s essentially what happened during the new deal era and the civil war respectively. Although arguably the external threats of WWII allowed the US to adapt rather than fall apart.

  • @peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s not even new. They did this to people during 2020 protests. They drove up in mini vans jumped out, grabbed people and pulled them into the mini van and drove off.

    There used to be footage of it but I haven’t been able to find it. I think it was happening in Portland and Seattle. At the time there was live stream footage. And it usually happened later in the night as people were cooling off and dispersing.

    America hasn’t been what it preaches for half century at least.

    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/evelyn-bassi-illegal-abudction-portland-protests-1357279/

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/feds-unmarked-vans-portland/

    The video snopes talks about I saw. Possibly even live streaming at the time because I was hooked on watching all that. Iirc it was a bronze gold colored minivan and the sliding door opened and 1 or two guys got out masked and just grabbed the person and pulled the protestor in and drove off.

    • @sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Am from Seattle.

      Yep, this happened in Seattle and Portland multiple times, just basically black bagging people into unmarked vans by… presumably, plain clothes / “off duty” / half kitted out, face obscured, no visible ID cops.

      They typically did this black bagging to people who had not actually broken any laws, but were so effective at keeping protester morale high, and/or were simply causing overwhelming masses of people to defend them from, in many cases, literally entirely unprovoked police assault/brutality.

      Most of these were the people they wanted to removr but knew that no charges would actually stick because they had nothing, and then release them 24-72 hours later.

      Sometimes they’d black bag / white van people who had actually crossed the threshold into doing something they could actually charge you for, but most of the time, nope.

      I know that in Portland the cops actively decided to act as body guards for fascists, and look the other way when they attacked people.

      In Seattle, … the cops intentionally started so much shit, assaulting nonviolent people, well we uh… we literally forced them to abandon their major police office in Capitol Hill.

      As in, we seiged them. Surrounded the building for days. Eventually they burned a bunch of records and made a stealthy withdrawal in the dead of night.

      That police center is only a few blocks from where the ‘CHAZ’ would be set up.

      Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone.

      As in, we literally drove out the local police and are thus now autonomous.

      … We’ve still never seen the all the actual communications between the police chief and mayor, other internal police records… because the police destroyed them. They destroyed them because they almost certainly outlined numerous violations of the law in terms of orders issued, tactics used, illegal arrests/detainments, bullshit ‘overtime’ overpayments and other financial shenanigans, crimes committed by the police and probably all the way up to the police chief and mayor engaging in a criminal conspiracy.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      I was in Seattle during this. Word was people got snatched here but I don’t recall seeing hard evidence myself. Portland though they for sure got caught kidnapping protesters

    • Yeather
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      There were a bunch of theories the people they black bagged were undercover / plainclothes cops. Every video I saw were of younger white guys in good shape getting taken off the streets.

    • @kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      52 days ago

      You always like to claim people say that, but no one ever says that. They said they wouldnt vote for anyone in any party who supports genocide. You twist it around to be the words you prefer. I call that lying, but to each their own.

      • @Red_October@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        52 days ago

        Meanwhile their vote or lack thereof directly empowered someone who actively encourages it, they just don’t want to take responsibility for that part.

        • @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          32 days ago

          It would not have been a problem if you had ranked choice voting.

          https://fairvote.org/

          If Musk sets up his own party that would split the conservative vote so the Republicans would finally be open to ranked choice. Would probably require ⅔ majority in Congress.

          But Dems might be too hungry for temporary power to support such a much needed fix.

          • @squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Ranked choice is nice, but why not just have an actually democratic system with coalitions? No need for a single winner.

            • @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Ranked choice allows for coalitions like in AU.

              Maybe you mean Multi Member Proportional voting like NZ and DE. That is the best system but complicated. US cannot even deal with converting to metric so MMP would result in exploding heads.

              • @squaresinger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                11 day ago

                Yes, that was what I was going for. The really big issue with FPTP systems, especially hard ones like the US is that they create two-party systems which are incredibly undemocratic.

                Third parties just can’t exist, because they split the vote for your side, so the only choice you have if you are unhappy with your party is to not vote or vote for the other party, and all that does is benefit that other party you’d be even more unhappy with.

                You know, kinda like one might think Harris isn’t left enough, so they end up helping Trump to power.

                But what’s even worse is that the elected president only ever represents close to 50% of the population, and he’s close to all-mighty and can do whatever he wants without anyone really checking him.

                In better systems coalitions between major parties form, and they represent a much bigger slice of the population, and they keep each other in check, having to compromise to not risk blowing up the coalition. And better systems also have a stronger and more living constitution. One that gets updated more frequently, and that has to be updated more frequently because it includes more details. Since constitutional changes then require a larger supermajority (e.g. 2/3 or 3/4), the governing coalition needs to take the needs of the opposition into account as well, because they need their votes when a constitutional change is required.

                For example, the US has had 27 constitutional amendments (10 of which happened within a year of the constitution being created, they were basically 0-day-patches) over the last 236 years.

                Austria has had about twice as many within the last 70 years.

                • @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  These coalitions still happen with ranked choice but only if a minor party is popular in a district.

                  Except for Tasmania in Australia where minor parties have an even better chance. It has only 5 districts for state elections and each district has 5 seats. Greens often get a seat because their candidate is 5th most popular in a district.

                  In other states they are now winning seats but fewer than Tasmania.