• UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 days ago

    That reminds me of that old first person shooter, The Operative: No One Lives Forever.

    This is a game that had a following and people have asked for a remaster or even just a GOG release.

    The problem is, no one actually knows who owns it today. It’s a bit of a legal mess.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      14 days ago

      The upshot is that since nobody knows whether they own it or not there is nobody bothering to actively enforce copyright, so you can just download the games for free if you want on NOLFrevival.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Such a fun game too.

        There also was a free add-on/extension (something) called Jack that was a short game.

        • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 days ago

          Both NOLF 1&2 and Contract JACK are available on the website above, patched and fixed to work on modern machines.

          YMMV but when I tried NOLF 1 for the first time earlier this year I sadly found the gameplay so poorly aged I wasn’t having enough fun to make myself finish it - despite the setting, theme and writing being quite fun.

          I might give it another shot at some point though, it was a critic’s darling back in the day and I’d like to be able to say I have played it.

          • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            Same here, I watched the rest of the game on YouTube and the creativity is astounding. Next to try is NOLF 2, hopefully that one is better aged.

          • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            Yea, the visuals and style of game play are great, but the mechanics are a little bland today.

            But as I think about it, the mechanics were a bit bland at the time - my 8 year old niece loved it.

  • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    14 days ago

    That’s a good question though. What happens if a right’s holder dies and doesn’t transfer the rights to others? Are the rights then public domain or what?

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    Marcin Paczynski told The Game Business he could “write a book”

    Please do

    He didn’t even know that he owned the rights because this was just a package with his inheritance … we have a lot of stories like that.

    Wow, no wonder the dude wasn’t aware. “Oh, just a box with papers. Meh”

    stories like developers whose physical documentation of IP ownership was torched in a fire

    It’s always interesting to know which games’ rights might seem “completely lost”, just so we can 🏴‍☠️ in peace. Say, wasn’t this strategy something GOG did originally? Just sell and see if the current rights-holder shows up?

  • Geodad@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I’m against the concept of intellectual property. Information should belong to the entirety of humanity.

    Just don’t bother asking someone who obviously doesn’t care anymore.

  • Kissaki@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    If you make a good effort to identify, locate, and contact copyright holders, but the path runs cold, can you disregard copyright? Maybe by claiming fair use or lack of traceable copyright?

    Trademark requires active use. I don’t believe there’s such a thing for copyright. Are there limits other than regular fair use and documented year expiration?

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 days ago

      No. You don’t get to just decide you have the right to use someone else’s work just because you coudn’t find them to ask, any more than you get to decide that you can use their car. Them not actively selling their works isn’t the equivalent of leaving the car derilict on public property.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 days ago

        It should be, and they should only get 14 years before it expires.