A growing number of Tories have been raising concerns about pylons, among them the former home secretary Priti Patel, who asked in parliament this week why the National Grid could not be built in the sea.
The Tories should get in the sea for this idea.
I know the Tories lack commonsense but still…
Unless you are prepared to move HVDC the costs are immense for moving AC cabling under the sea. The reason we use pylons is be cause there is a massive energy drain if you place cables in the ground over long distances. This problem is near doubled in losses if you place the cables in water.
Can’t MPs learn a little about search engines. We have kids getting smarter every generation because they have such good access to information, and yet some MPs are still stuck in the middle ages.
The cables also have to come onshore at some point, especially if one of the aims is to better connect inland rural communities.
Which will mean some sort of pylon.
Not if global warming raises sea levels suffciently! … taps forehead
It’s all part of a broader plan to harness the untapped energy trade with Atlantis and Doggerland.
This is such a silly one, pylons have been here well before I was born, to me they are a part of the landscape, I literally have one within 200m of my house.
As the other commentor says, unless we’re intending on moving to HVDC, then there’s not real point as losses will be rather staggering.
NIMBYism at its absolute finest. Fuck me
