Why aren´t you reporting on that child´s burial? I guess you´re trying to hide it from us, just like the friggin´ BBC!

Also, you sound like a happy person

If you read about a missile strike hitting newspapers´ offices and killing a bunch of journalists and you think that must be ´a little whoopsie-daisy mistake´, that just makes me think that you´re not part of their target audience.

They have the CBBC that would explain things more thoroughly if they consider it necessary or you could look for outside sources that explain how airstrikes work, which in turn frees up space to add other information.

Likewise, I don´t think that the BBC believes that their target audience requires a follow-up article to zxplain to them that the victims received a funeral.

Should they cover every journalist´s funeral (especially if they´ve already covered them being killed)? What other coverage should they drop to create the space? What if they lose all their readers because they´re covering nothing else but funerals?

Wait so they did mention the newspapers were struck? If they did that why would anyone feel the need to bitch about them ´ignoring the funerals´?

Whoever did it, at least we know (s)he had to be part of a well regulated militia

Sure, replacing the government that ran on continuing the peace process by one that vowed to end it didn´t make any difference. History is just a red fog that doesn´t really matter, does it

That’s the same justification Bibi uses for his side’s killings

Netanyahu was down more than 20% after the peace accords had been signed. Hamas’ string of bomb attacks in the runup to the election helped him to narrowly win the vote by 0.5%

Yeah, after Hamas helped Netanyahu into the PM seat with their bombing campaign to stop the peace process, he was able to sabotage it all he wanted, mainly by fully backing the settlement movement. But my point is: what if Hamas wouldn’t have done so?

…and do you think that made the world a better place?

They´re also just a group of men who´ve blown up other families to stop the Oslo Accords

They´re basically donating food and medicine to the IDF

Can attend the flight / can not attend the flight

My correction on how most jewish Israelis today aren´t exactly (descendants of) European settlers? How did your post ´correct´ that? You only argued the other jews don´t really count as you consider them pawns lol

Ok but if you believe that they constitute the real OG hARdCorE zionist gangstas, then why would you argue that they would be the ones leaving??

Akshually, around 45% of Israeli jews are of Middle Eastern and North African descent, around the same as those from Europe

I think you´ve strayed far and wide from your original claim that Lebanon is on the brink of being conquered by Israel and the only thing keeping them from acting on it is, apparently, Hezbollah being allowed to fire a rocket or mortar across the border every once in a while

Israel invaded Lebanon because the PLO were launching attacks from there, with the goal of establishing a Maronite buffer state. If you´ve really been led to believe that they “began colonization efforts” then you need to read up on the history of the conflict.

A handful of religious goofs throwing model airplanes over the border does not constitute an invasion or conquest.

They are acting agressively to make sure Hezbollah keeps to their part of the peace deal. But how does that fit into your story of them wanting to conquer tje whole of Lebanon?

As for your question: Jordan and Egypt chose nonviolence 50 years ago and that solved a lot of things.

How do you explain Israel retreating back to their border after forcing Hezbollah to stop their attacks?

That doesn´t seem to jive with your claim that they are somehow intent on conquering Lebanon