@jroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoknow the features of your languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up1641arrow-down10
arrow-up1641arrow-down1imageknow the features of your languagelemmy.world@jroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-square@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink4•2 years agoMost languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
minus-square@Feathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoYeah it’s nice to be able to see it
Most languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
Yeah it’s nice to be able to see it