@pbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgmessage-square279fedilinkarrow-up1556arrow-down10cross-posted to: foss@beehaw.org
arrow-up1556arrow-down1external-linkTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.org@pbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square279fedilinkcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.org
minus-square@therealjcdenton@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish16•edit-21 year agoThere are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
minus-square@Unmapped@lemmy.mllinkfedilink18•1 year agoAnarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
minus-square@chobeat@lemmy.mllinkfedilink8•1 year agoCommenting with no clue what people are talking about
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]linkfedilink7•1 year agoAnarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.
There are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
Anarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
Commenting with no clue what people are talking about
Anarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.