@mdurell@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoIf pants wore pants...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1553arrow-down10
arrow-up1553arrow-down1imageIf pants wore pants...lemmy.world@mdurell@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-square@qisope@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilink56•1 year agogiven that the word 'pants ’ sounds like a plural, perhaps we can assume each leg is an independent entity and deserves its own pair of pants. i chose left.
minus-square@fossphi@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish29•1 year agoWho are you, who is so wise in the ways of science?
minus-square@ImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilink8•1 year agoThis is how you say it in French. “Un Pantalon”
minus-square@moistclump@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•1 year agoBut we have “legs” and give each leg a pant. Therefore wouldn’t each pant also just have one pant?
given that the word 'pants ’ sounds like a plural, perhaps we can assume each leg is an independent entity and deserves its own pair of pants. i chose left.
Who are you, who is so wise in the ways of science?
“Yes, Sir. I would like to buy one pant!”
This is how you say it in French. “Un Pantalon”
But we have “legs” and give each leg a pant. Therefore wouldn’t each pant also just have one pant?
Pant