@Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoThis is the waylemmy.mlimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down10
arrow-up1114arrow-down1imageThis is the waylemmy.ml@Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-square@ZeroEcks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish19•1 year agoSometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
minus-squareRustmilianlinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-21 year agoTrue, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%. Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
minus-squarelittleblue✨linkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year agoOP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
minus-squarelittleblue✨linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoI’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
True, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%.
Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
No shit Sherlock 🫴
I’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
I have no time for children.
yo momma🤌🏿