@CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 year agoWell, that was unexpectedsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1316arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1316arrow-down1imageWell, that was unexpectedsh.itjust.works@CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.deMlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-21 year agoright, but back then appearing stronk and going to war were popular moves, not how it would work now. also elections already happened unless you mean this false flag as a pretext for withdrawing from ukraine and going all in in afghanistan (again)
minus-square@S_204@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoThey’re using it as an excuse to amp up action in Ukraine, it’s going to be retaliation for the attacks on the gas infrastructure.
minus-square@skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.deMlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agothey could use, you know, attacks against refineries as pretext
right, but back then appearing stronk and going to war were popular moves, not how it would work now. also elections already happened
unless you mean this false flag as a pretext for withdrawing from ukraine and going all in in afghanistan (again)
They’re using it as an excuse to amp up action in Ukraine, it’s going to be retaliation for the attacks on the gas infrastructure.
they could use, you know, attacks against refineries as pretext