• Pennomi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 year ago

    Copilot is often a brilliant autocomplete, that alone will save workers plenty of time if they learn to use it.

    I know that as a programmer, I spend a large percentage of my time simply transcribing correct syntax of whatever’s in my brain to the editor, and Copilot speeds that process up dramatically.

    • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      I feel like the process of getting the code right is how I learn. If I just type vague garbage in and the AI tool fixes it up, I’m not really going to learn much.

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Autocomplete doesn’t write algorithms for you, it writes syntax. (Unless the algorithm is trivial.) You could use your brain to learn just the important stuff and let the AI handle the minutiae.

      • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Where “learn” means “memorize arbitrary syntax that differs across languages”? Anyone trying to use copilot as a substitute for learning concepts is going to have a bad time.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I use AI a lot as well as a SWE. The other day I used it to remove an old feature flag from our server graphs along with all now-deprecated code in one click. Unit tests still passed after, saved me like 1-2 hours of manual work.

      It’s good for boilerplate and refactors more than anything