• @li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1431 year ago

    If my dogs ever tried to kill me, I’d just pin them both down. That’s the benefit of not having insanely powerful dogs.

    IMO you shouldn’t have a dog that you can’t physically restrain. Any dog can snap and you need to be able to physically stop them if that happens.

    • @Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      451 year ago

      Any dog can snap

      Dishonest statement. That’s like saying “Any ceiling fan can decapitate you”. Technically true, but so extraordinarily unlikely for most breeds that you should be more worried about car crashes if you fear for your life…

    • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 year ago

      Any dog can snap

      any animal can snap.

      I guess you don’t think people should have st. bernards or great danes? I mean, I’m not suggesting people keep wolves or lions as pets, but this bully dog fearmongering is out of control. IMHO, it’s not the breed, it’s the training and owner.

        • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          breed is literally bred to increase aggression over hundreds of generations

          absolute bullshit, unless they’re being bred by chuds for dogfights (despicable) this is not a thing

      • DarkThoughts
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        If your breed requires special training to not maul you or others to death, then that just proves the point of the breed being dangerous and that it should be outlawed. But please, continue to make some more bullshit excuses.

        • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If your breed requires special training to not maul you or others to death,

          where is this indicated?

          My brother/sister in dogs: 30,000ish years ago, some fucking wolf/dingo/mongrel-mutt threw their lot in with ours. We have, mutually, benefitted enormously. I love dogs and trust a lot more of them than I do humans to do the right thing. This isn’t developed anecdotally, it’s a lifetime of dogs as part of our family, and operating around working dogs in the military. They deserve our respect, and training is one part of any dog’s life that humans need to learn. Most training isn’t for the dog, it’s for the family members.

          I’d recommend anyone with any dog go through training, whether a specific program or simply to acclimate the animal to your house (where and when we go outside and who’s food is who’s etc.,) but also to train them to react and behave in awkward situations. I’ve had toddlers lurch across the room, grab my dog’s faces and and poke at their eyes - and the toddlers got licked.

          Special training? YOU SHOULD TRAIN YOUR ANIMALS PERIOD. you wouldn’t trust a cat to behave around a toddler, a dog, a parrot (nearly lost a finger meeting a white parrot once!), hells man/ma’am…

          apply some sense to it all.

          • DarkThoughts
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            where is this indicated?

            In the fact that this keeps on happening even with experienced owners.

            • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              it’s putting words into my mouth, I never indicated any such thing.

              want to make a point? don’t use me as your sock puppet to do it, be adult enough to make your own assertions sport.

              • @h3h3productions@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                My brother in buddy, they weren’t putting words in your mouth. They were using outside factors to answer a question you made.

                Want to talk down to someone? How about doing it to someone without having to make erroneous assumptions and jumping the defensive gun? Be adult enough to not belittle people like this chief.

      • @Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 year ago

        I agree in the sense that some dog breeds aren’t necessary and are actively unhealthy for the animal and the breed should be allowed to die out removing the ability for people to be owners of those breeds, and therefore ownerless

      • @littlewonder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s a difference between that and policies that discourage breeding, etc.

        I don’t see many people advocating to outright kill dogs. There are a ton of pits in every shelter and yet people still run backyard breeding operations or tell everyone to get a pit. The breed would be better served if we told people they were more of an advanced breed that need the right kind of owners and environment.

        • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I noticed my guinea pigs have never tried to murder me. Granted in a home invasion they are pretty useless. Unless I like throw their squeaky bodies at said invader or overpower him and make him drink from the water dish as vengeance.

          • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 year ago

            I bet more cows are killed in a year than all shelter dogs on earth.

            So, for most folks, the “no death” argument is silly

                • @morphballganon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Cow farms supply food for humans. I’m not saying that’s the most ethical thing in the world, but it is done. Would dogs serve the same purpose? They would produce less, lower quality meat per head.

              • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                Dogs aren’t put down for their meat, so the discussion of the acceptability of putting dogs down is not based on their meat.

                Thus, the point is about humans simply killing animals.

                This isn’t about the human imposed utility, it’s about if it’s fine for humans to decide what animals live and die. Humans don’t need beef to live, there are other foods, so humans make a human centric choice to kill cows.

                Since humans are deciding what animals.live, based purely on human wants, why would dogs be free of that assessment?