• @justastranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    1242 years ago

    Alt: proprietary software devs trying to live off their work as their primary income source while still allowing people to use their product for free

    • Regular Human
      link
      fedilink
      572 years ago

      I swear, lemmy users have proven to be so entitled. Just don’t buy it.

    • Captain Beyond
      link
      fedilink
      162 years ago

      As an end-user I believe I am entitled to the freedom to use, modify, and share the software I use. If your business model is incompatible with my values I won’t support you, simple as. I don’t have any problem monetarily supporting developers but not if they disagree with my principles.

      I’m pretty sure I’ve seen this exact argument made against ad-blockers, too.

      • Kayn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        You do have the freedom to modify the proprietary binary you’re being given. You just can’t distribute your modifications.

    • snooggums
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      Reality: what you pay goes more to monetization than the user experience

    • Zloubida
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      If it spies on me, if it shows me ads, then it’s not free.

      • scytale
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Yeah, I think a lot of the people who are against are the ones who don’t like the ad-removal model, because you are paying to remove ads on an app that uses a platform whose foundation is built against ads and tracking. The subscription model or one-time payment for life is fair IMO; people are free to support the dev (and please support the lemmy devs and instance admins too!). It’s the ads (and tracking that come with it) that’s kinda weird.