• KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    LLMs are incredibly bad at any math because they just predict the most likely answer, so if you ask them to generate a random number between 1 and 100 it’s most likely to be 47 or 34. Because it’s just picking a selection of numbers that humans commonly use, and those happen to be the most statistically common ones, for some reason.

    doesn’t mean that it won’t try, it’ll just be incredibly wrong.

    • Schadrach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Because it’s just picking a selection of numbers that humans commonly use, and those happen to be the most statistically common ones, for some reason.

      The reason is probably dumb, like people picking a common fraction (half or a third) and then fuzzing it a little to make it “more random”. Is the third place number close to but not quite 25 or 75?

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        idk the third place number off the top of my head, but that might be the case, although you would have to do some really weird data collection in order to get that number.

        I think it’s just something fundamentally pleasing about the number itself that the human brain latches onto. I suspect it has something to do with primes, or “pseudo” primes, numbers that seem like primes, but aren’t since they’re probably over represented in our head among “random” numbers even though primes are perfectly predictable.

        • Schadrach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Ok, that’s interesting, but you amusingly picked the wrong number in the original comment, picking 34 rather than 37.