• @FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    Burning an item be it a flag or a book is a quintessential form of free speech. It’s a clear way of expressing discontent towards an idea.

    Controversial speech is the most important kind of free speech. If we only allowed speech we agreed with society wouldn’t advance and grow.

    Ideas like ‘Women should get to vote’ once were controversial and that expression might have been met in an incendiary manner by it’s opponents, none the less that speech was important to protect.

    If you only support free speech for ideals you agree with you don’t support free speech at all.

    • @gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      But not all speech is protected speech. The same should be true here. Like as an extreme example, should the KKK be allowed to burn a cross outside a black person’s house?

      • @FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        On that black man’s lawn? No. On their own? Knock themselves out.

        Like I said if you draw the line at the ends of your own beliefs you don’t believe in free speech. I have enough faith in the general public to come to the correct (read: not the kkk’s) conclusion on that matter.

        Let them speak, and the world will hear their points don’t have merit.