DrewM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works • 11 months agoBelchingsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1365arrow-down10
arrow-up1365arrow-down1imageBelchingsopuli.xyzDrewM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works • 11 months agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-square@fibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink46•edit-211 months agoShould be age > (my_age / 2) +7
minus-squareCavemanlinkfedilink12•11 months agoFound the programmer thread that criticises the data model instead of the t-shirt
minus-square@Gladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilink8•11 months agoOr (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`
minus-square@fibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•11 months agoUh, no no. The rule is “half my age plus seven”. I’ve no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.
minus-square@ji17br@lemmy.mllinkfedilink8•11 months agoHe’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.
minus-square@absGeekNZ@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoThis “rule” only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish If you are 14 then the range for “age” is 14 - 14 If you are 30 then the range for “age” is 22 - 46 If you are 40 then the range for “age” is 27 - 66 At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.
Should be
age > (my_age / 2) +7Found the programmer thread that criticises the data model instead of the t-shirt
Or (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`
Uh, no no. The rule is “half my age plus seven”. I’ve no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.
He’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.
This “rule” only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish
If you are 14 then the range for “age” is 14 - 14
If you are 30 then the range for “age” is 22 - 46
If you are 40 then the range for “age” is 27 - 66
At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.
deleted by creator