Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them] to urbanism@hexbear.netEnglish • 2 years agotrains plshexbear.netimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1270arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1270arrow-down1imagetrains plshexbear.netParsani [love/loves, comrade/them] to urbanism@hexbear.netEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square65fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish14•edit-22 years agoSan Francisco? Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami, Philadelphia and Boston would all like a word. Los Angeles and Chicago in particular.
minus-squareiridaniotter [they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish18•edit-22 years agoPopulation-wise some of those are too low compared to Chinese T1 cities. But there’s no official definition so…
minus-squareClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish15•2 years agoYeah I wouldn’t expect any of those except maybe LA to be considered tier 1, I said those ones because they’re all larger than San Francisco lol
minus-square@zephyreks@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 years agoSan Francisco has a healthy and vibrant metro surrounding it though. There’s Oakland to the East and the entirety of Silicon Valley to the South (including San Jose).
minus-squareClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoEven including that it doesn’t break 8 million people
minus-square@zephyreks@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoBoston isn’t even close to tier 1.
minus-squareClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoI agree but it’s closer than San Fransisco
minus-square@zephyreks@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoIn terms of population or infrastructure?
minus-squarecorgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years ago Chicago in particular. puts down pizza hello!
San Francisco? Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami, Philadelphia and Boston would all like a word. Los Angeles and Chicago in particular.
Population-wise some of those are too low compared to Chinese T1 cities. But there’s no official definition so…
Yeah I wouldn’t expect any of those except maybe LA to be considered tier 1, I said those ones because they’re all larger than San Francisco lol
San Francisco has a healthy and vibrant metro surrounding it though. There’s Oakland to the East and the entirety of Silicon Valley to the South (including San Jose).
Even including that it doesn’t break 8 million people
Boston isn’t even close to tier 1.
I agree but it’s closer than San Fransisco
In terms of population or infrastructure?
puts down pizza hello!