cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/20260243

Google Chrome warns uBlock Origin may soon be disabled

Google Chrome is now encouraging uBlock Origin users who have updated to the latest version to switch to other ad blockers before Manifest v2 extensions are disabled.

  • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    14410 months ago

    I think people come down a lot harder on Firefox than they should. It’s a great browser, and they do a lot for the freedom of the community and as an open source ambassador.

    I feel like people generally feel that, given their prominence, they could do a lot more. This is certainly true. Their weird corporate structure, their half-baked experiments like Pocket or VPN, their Google ad money, these are all valid issues.

    But do you know what else is supported by Google ad money? Chromium and every browser built on it. Do you know what has a far more corporate culture? Chrome, Edge, Safari, etc. Do you know who else had weird little money making experiments? Every other browser (Brave’s Basic Attention Tokens, DDG’s Privacy Pro, etc.).

    Firefox makes a bigger target because of their relative popularity and long history.

    • @stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      1510 months ago

      When Chrome came out it was heavily promoted by everyone I knew (apart from my best friend) I tried it, didn’t like the UI (still don’t) and didn’t see the point of it.

      People talked abour how fast it was, and I felt that Firefox was fast enough, and Firefox just worked as I wanted it to, why change?

      I kept stedfast with Firefox, apart from when the horrible Australis UI was launched, then I switched to a fork called Pale Moon, which I used for several years untill the current UI was launched.

      • bountygiver [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        it actually WAS really good when it first came out and for a few years, it was also back during the days where google still kind of follows the “don’t be evil” principle.

        • Carighan Maconar
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Yeah there’s a good reason we all started to use it, unlike Firefox it was far far quicker to boot up and load pages. And used significantly less resources, so there was really little upside to using Firefox apart from a few addons not being available for a while.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yup, I used it for a year or two, then I found Opera, which was about as fast and also had an independent rendering engine. Around that time, the independence of the rendering engine really mattered to me, so when Opera switched to a Chromium base, I switched back to Firefox. Firefox has since caught up in perf and is the best non-Chromium browser for me (well, I use Mull on Android because FF isn’t on F-Droid and has some defaults I prefer to Fennec).

    • @Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      1410 months ago

      I’ve best heard it described as: people love Firefox to death.

      People, use whatever you like, but if you actively discourage everyone to stop using it, we might lose it - and with it, Librewolf, Palemoon, Tor Browser, and everything that’s not Chrome or Safari.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      fedilink
      1210 months ago

      Honestly it’s more that Lemmy as a whole is just a big group of curmudgeons. Most discussions on here veer strongly negative, not limited to Firefox.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 months ago

      I want there to be a competitive market so that Firefox gets better. Without good competition it will continue to rot.

      • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        I don’t understand the premise of this statement. Do you think Firefox doesn’t have competition in the browser space?

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          It only has Chromium which somehow is worse than Firefox. We need something that supports all the same features as Firefox but isn’t a fork

          • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            Are you talking about the rendering engine? Safari still uses WebKit. Everything else was killed off by chrome. No one wanted to make addons for Internet Explorer, so they switched to Chromium as well.

            It would be extremely difficult to put something new into the market at this point. If even Microsoft lacked the resources, it’s hard to imagine anyone succeeding IMO.

              • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                110 months ago

                True, I forgot that is happening. Hopefully it makes a big splash. It’ll be interesting to see how they handle add-ons. I doubt that a modern browser can succeed without it. From my understanding, there may not be any interoperability with existing browser extensions.

            • That’s certainly what I mean, but I can’t speak for anyone else. I used Opera for years until they switched to being a Chromium-based browser, and Safari isn’t an option on Windows or Linux, so I use Firefox. It’s really not any more complicated than that.

        • @fernlike3923@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          It doesn’t have competition in terms of a “private browser”. As far as I can see there is only Brave, and Ungoogled Chromium which is soon to be an unviable option because of the switch to Manifest V3 for Chromium.

          There are of course browsers like Mullvad Browser, GNU Icecat and Librewolf etc. but they are all based on Firefox, so I wouldn’t really count them.