• @Vorpal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Seems rather limited: only targeting some high level languages. Now, if this could also generate C++ bindings i would be very interested.

    • @Knusper@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Hmm, but Rust has native generation of C bindings. Is there a big difference with C+±specific bindings?

      • @snaggen@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        If you refer to bindgen it also supports C++, and since Mozilla who was the main driver of rust uses C++ I assume the bindgen for that is pretty good.

        • @Knusper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Ah, thanks. I did not know that, but I figured, if C+±specific bindings make sense, then Mozilla would have built something for that, before working on UniFFI.