Vuraniute to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agofixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square836fedilinkarrow-up11Karrow-down10
arrow-up11Karrow-down1imagefixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubVuraniute to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square836fedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish17•2 years agoThis is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
minus-square@JohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink3•2 years agoLook up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish12•2 years agoWhy do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?
minus-square@JohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•2 years agoI don’t define axioms. It is the general definition commonly used, as recorded (but not decided) by the dictionary. Do you in fact have a different definition?
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish12•2 years agoWords have the meaning we give them, not always just the original meaning
minus-square@JohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•2 years agoExactly. And the general meaning is the one I just gave.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish12•edit-22 years agoBut general definition is not stable it changes. You’re just saying this in a way to negate my definition. Why do you get to define it?
minus-square@JohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink1•2 years agoThe majority/community defines it has hasn’t changed it yet.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish11•2 years agoSo you’re trying to say words have actual meanings?
This is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
Look up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
Why do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?
I don’t define axioms. It is the general definition commonly used, as recorded (but not decided) by the dictionary. Do you in fact have a different definition?
Words have the meaning we give them, not always just the original meaning
Exactly. And the general meaning is the one I just gave.
But general definition is not stable it changes. You’re just saying this in a way to negate my definition. Why do you get to define it?
The majority/community defines it has hasn’t changed it yet.
So you’re trying to say words have actual meanings?