@Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 8 months agosocial media rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1726arrow-down10
arrow-up1726arrow-down1imagesocial media rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 8 months agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareTxzKlinkfedilink124•8 months agoI just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
minus-squareOrbituarylinkfedilinkEnglish29•8 months agoLiterary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
minus-squareswitchboard_petelinkfedilink63•8 months agoliterally is objectively correct in this context
minus-square@Voltage@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink15•8 months agoI used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
minus-square@Anivia@feddit.orglinkfedilink1•8 months agoIt’s the same number on every Instagram profile
minus-square@Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilink8•8 months agoi haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
I just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
Literary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
literally is objectively correct in this context
Literaryly
I used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
It’s the same number on every Instagram profile
i haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
you did 🙀