• @Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    69 months ago

    I mean… I can think of a few classes and groups that have the vast lion’s share, but I’m not here to get banned.

    • Buelldozer
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      Eh, nobody is going to get banned (at least not from my instance) as long as it stays inbounds.

      There are well understood reasons why sexual abusers cluster into certain jobs, such as priests, but they are commonly found all over the world in every social, political, and economic class. The truth is that for for every Jerry Sandusky or Vince McMahon you hear about there’s 100, or even 1000, non-famous people that you don’t hear about.

      • @Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        I was actually referring to men…

        I also would like to see the data on how much more likely a famous/rich/powerful person is to be actually tried/prosecuted if they abused boys/men vs girls/women. It sure feels like it at least gets way more publicity when it’s boys/men as victims.

              • @Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                I’m really not following your argument. I don’t think I have to defend the statement “Men are a group”. So I won’t. But if you’d like to explain your point, please feel free.