@Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 8 months agoHyundai unveils world’s first hydrogen-powered, silent stealth battle tankwww.yahoo.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1276arrow-down10
arrow-up1276arrow-down1external-linkHyundai unveils world’s first hydrogen-powered, silent stealth battle tankwww.yahoo.com@Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-square@Hubi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglish45•8 months agoDoes noise really matter that much on a modern battlefield with one surveillance drone every 200 meters?
minus-squareiktlinkfedilinkEnglish71•edit-28 months agothe other feature is low to no heat, so these things are like tank drop bears
minus-square@JohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoYeah, it would make them a lot harder to spot on infra red cameras.
minus-square@JohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoMost NATO countries are assuming air dominance, which would make drones less survivable. They really thrive in a contested environment.
minus-square@DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish2•8 months agoI don’t know that NATO’s assumption of air dominance is actually applicable. You’re not putting a F-35 on anti-drone swarm duties. If anything you’d want to focus on anti-air.
Does noise really matter that much on a modern battlefield with one surveillance drone every 200 meters?
the other feature is low to no heat, so these things are like tank drop bears
Instance checks out
Yeah, it would make them a lot harder to spot on infra red cameras.
Most NATO countries are assuming air dominance, which would make drones less survivable. They really thrive in a contested environment.
I don’t know that NATO’s assumption of air dominance is actually applicable. You’re not putting a F-35 on anti-drone swarm duties.
If anything you’d want to focus on anti-air.
Lasers maaann