@not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 6 months agokicking feet rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1675arrow-down10
arrow-up1675arrow-down1imagekicking feet rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-square@activ8r@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agoI wonder if a good lawyer could argue that any jury that finds him guilty are, by definition, not his peers.
minus-square@WraithGear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-26 months agoI don’t see that working even if the court system hadn’t evolved into an apparatus solely for the enforcement of class strata. His peers are the general public.
I wonder if a good lawyer could argue that any jury that finds him guilty are, by definition, not his peers.
I don’t see that working even if the court system hadn’t evolved into an apparatus solely for the enforcement of class strata. His peers are the general public.