• @TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    wow that is an obtuse comparison

    that is like claiming the grocery store is stealing from you for charging for goods.

    • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What do you mean? They’re literally restricting random link clickers from reading their articles

      Oh, I’d also say that 404 media deserves to burn down for being dicks

      • @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        Yeah, not really clearing up the point you’re trying to make.

        And showing that you obviously got an axe to grind with quite well regarded journalists sure is… a strategy…

      • @datavoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        If you were determined to read this article for free, I’m certain there is a way.

        That being said, I don’t think the issue here is with 404 Media. The majority of news sites operate this way - if people are given the option to donate, 99.9% of them just won’t. Whoever is researching and writing these articles (a team of 4 people by the sounds of it) likely need to eat and pay rent. Personally I feel better about not paying for something like NYT or Washington Post than I do for a smaller and apparently less corrupt site like 404.

        • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          This is a free article. They require an account on the site to read even the free articles, and that’s just plain bullshit