awful.systems
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years ago

I never understood this logic

lemmy.sdf.org

message-square
161
fedilink
1.97K

I never understood this logic

lemmy.sdf.org

@seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years ago
message-square
161
fedilink
  • @crashoverride@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    30•
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Same thing with having one of those breathalyzer things on your car. You have to pay to have it installed, pay a monthly fee in addition to all the other shit you’ve already paid for. And then you can only go a very few certain places. Makes it incredibly difficult to recover from that. It’s not to punish you or keep you off the road after a DUI, it’s so they can extract more money from you

    • @MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28•2 years ago

      They don’t arbitrarily hand those things out… Don’t drink and drive and it’s not a problem.

      • @YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        12•2 years ago

        Our entire bar/nightclub economy would collapse if nobody drank and drove. Not defending it, just pointing out America has terrible public transportation and very little means to access these places without driving.

      • @boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        6•2 years ago

        Eh, yet. There’s talk of mandating them for new cars.

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10•2 years ago

          Where?

          • @Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            3•2 years ago

            America and it already passed in 2021 to be effective 2025 source: https://www.kbb.com/car-news/new-law-will-require-in-car-breathalyzers/

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3•2 years ago

              In the other article linked by that one it says it’s just a recommendation. Seems weird.

              A federal advisory board recommended yesterday that safety regulators require “alcohol impairment detection systems to be included in all new vehicles.” The move is just a recommendation, but it has the weight of law behind it.

          • @boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            2•2 years ago

            EU.

            • @Yadaran@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              8•2 years ago

              Lmfao not at all

              • @boonhet@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                3•2 years ago

                They ended up requiring only ease of installation but it’s definitely something that was on the cards.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6•2 years ago

              Source?

              • @boonhet@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                6•2 years ago

                My bad, they only ended up mandating ease of breathalyzer installation https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12799-Road-safety-easy-installation-of-alcohol-interlocks-in-vehicles_en

        • @Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1•2 years ago

          If they become mandatory, they’re probably not going to restrict where you can go.

          • @boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            1•2 years ago

            Hopefully, but it’s still a device to maintain and check at special government approved companies.

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2•2 years ago

        Human beings make mistakes.

    • @Ibex0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      6•2 years ago

      They limit where you can go? Like with GPS reporting to somebody?

      • @mostNONheinous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10•2 years ago

        I’ve unfortunately had the pleasure of needing one of these interlock devices installed on my car back in 2010. It’s definitely been awhile but the device only limits where you could go if you had alcohol in your system, and that limit would be NOWHERE. If you were sober you just had to blow clean every 5-20 minutes and I could drive as much as I pleased. The option without the device was no driving except to and from work and maybe the grocery store 1-2 times a week.

        • qaz
          link
          fedilink
          3•2 years ago

          go if you had alcohol in your system, and that limit would be NOWHERE.

          Isn’t that kind of the point of such a device?

          • @mostNONheinous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1•2 years ago

            Yes, I was explaining to the person I replied to because they clearly didn’t have a true understanding of how the device works.

            • qaz
              link
              fedilink
              1•2 years ago

              Okay, then I misunderstood the tone of your comment.

        • @uint8_t@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          3•2 years ago

          how comes you had to have this installed?

      • @Baku@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1•
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @mostNONheinous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2•2 years ago

          I’ve had one before and without it you can only go to work and the grocery store. With it you just have to blow sober and you are free to drive as you please, it’s like having the judge in the car to make sure you don’t fuck up.

Memes@lemmy.ml

!memes@lemmy.ml

remote_follow_modal_title

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 688 users / day
  • 3.11K users / week
  • 6.93K users / month
  • 20.7K users / 6 months
  • 51.4K subscribers
  • 12.7K Posts
  • 238K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop
  • @sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • Cyclohexane
  • Arthur Besse
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org