Lena to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 4 months agoTechnically correct, the best kind of correctgregtech.euimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1533arrow-down10
arrow-up1533arrow-down1imageTechnically correct, the best kind of correctgregtech.euLena to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-square@Ranvier@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish48•4 months agoHow about just 0 and 1? They didn’t specify what base.
minus-square@Elgenzay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish40•edit-24 months agoCould also say pi is just 10 in base π
minus-square@MBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish14•edit-24 months ago9 (the base pi number) doesn’t exist because all digits must be less than pi. 9 (the base 10 number) is apparently roughly 22.2021120021 in base pi. Edit: a bit of explanation for that last one, it’s because 2π + 2 + 2/π + 2/π3 + 1/π4 ≈ 8.99
minus-square@deo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agowould all integers necessarily be irrational in base π?
minus-squareMohamedlinkfedilinkEnglish5•4 months agoExcept for 0, 1, 2, 3. Integers are necessarily irrational because π is transcendental and not an algebraic number.
minus-square@zeca@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agohow are you defining irrational? the definition i know is not base dependent.
How about just 0 and 1? They didn’t specify what base.
Could also say pi is just 10 in base π
What’s 9 in base pi?
9 (the base pi number) doesn’t exist because all digits must be less than pi. 9 (the base 10 number) is apparently roughly 22.2021120021 in base pi.
Edit: a bit of explanation for that last one, it’s because 2π + 2 + 2/π + 2/π3 + 1/π4 ≈ 8.99
would all integers necessarily be irrational in base π?
Except for 0, 1, 2, 3.
Integers are necessarily irrational because π is transcendental and not an algebraic number.
how are you defining irrational? the definition i know is not base dependent.