• @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          NATO didn’t intervene in Lybia, it were just some NATO aligned countries.

          If NATO did intervene, it would have included ALL NATO countries. As is the point of their pact. If one is at war, they all combine forces.

          Since plenty of NATO countries abstained, it is therefore no NATO intervention.

          But you rather spew Russian disinformation, don’t you?

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      This argument doesn’t make sense. Even if you do accept that NATO is not purely defensive because of what happened in Libya, blaming NATO for Russia invading another country that isn’t in NATO makes as much sense as me blaming my brother John for the fact that my other brother Robert was beating his wife, and then violently taking it out on John.

      And that’s ignoring the reason NATO is expanding. It expands when new countries decide they want to join it. And countries at present are wanting to join it because they feel threatened by Russia. The reason for its expansion is Russia’s aggression, so to turn back and blame NATO for Russia’s aggression is completely backwards.