@ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-215 days agodeleted by creatorgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1391arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldusa@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1391arrow-down1external-linkdeleted by creatorgizmodo.com@ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-215 days agomessage-square50fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldusa@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmit.online
minus-square@jacecomix@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish16•4 months agoInterested in seeing how well the armed guard equivalent of “the Uber Eats driver who eats your food instead of delivering it” works out for them.
minus-square@Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish10•4 months agoBackground checks can’t catch everyone.
Interested in seeing how well the armed guard equivalent of “the Uber Eats driver who eats your food instead of delivering it” works out for them.
Background checks can’t catch everyone.
Look at G4S’ track record, for example