• @rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    195 months ago

    Here in Germany they did succeed with it. Oat milk has to be called something like “Hafer-Drink” (note the anglicism) (literally “oat drink”).

    • @gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah, but tbh, it kinda makes sense. You can’t print something on the packaging that says something that’s not the case. You can’t call it “oat milk”, because otherwise people should rightfully assume it was milk with some oat in it.

      • @rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        235 months ago

        No, that wouldn’t be “rightful”. It’s common knowledge that soy milk, oat milk, coconut milk and scouring cream (Scheuermilch in German) don’t contain cow milk. And it was never an issue when coconut milk was the only alternative milk-like product that was widely available.

      • @iusearchbtw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        125 months ago

        Imagine calling a non dairy liquid “milk” prior to ten years ago, not conceivable

        Coconut milk, milk of magnesium, soy milk? Made up woke nonsense

      • @Genius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        It is milk with some oat in it. The milk part of the oat. That’s exactly what it is.

        You mean people might think it’s breast milk with some oat in it.

        Rather than legislating plant milk, I suggest we legislate breast milk so that it legally has to have the word breast on the packaging.