deleted by creator

  • @grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The reason why Chromium uses LGPL is because they forked the code from Safari, which had previously forked the code from KHTML (KDE’s web rendering component, used in Konqueror). The LGPL was provably insufficient to prevent corporate usurpation of the project, as a historical fact.

    As for the “A” part of AGPL not being relevant for locally-run software, (1) it doesn’t hurt either, and (2) having maximal protections could prevent weird corporate shenanigans that we haven’t thought of yet.

    • @MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      The LGPL does its job, it’s not as copyleft as GPL or AGPL, but having those licenses doesn’t guarantee that companies will use it, like Gab, which used a fork of Mastodont, Truth Social, or Pawoo. If you want a more restrictive license, the OSI basically won’t accept it as open source because it doesn’t meet their guidelines.

      Also, there are no other browsers due to the standards set by W3C and therefore browsers have to have corporate support.