• @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 months ago

    Hahaha it’s so nice to read why? And it’s because of crime. Huh? I ask why ban these. They say again crime. I go ah like guns then. Like you ban the engines of death not used in hunting ever but used to mow down kids in schools at an alarming rate? No? Ah. What do you mean then? Oh. You are saying there’s legitimate use for an extended mag uzi that says kill kids on the side. But not something that can emit fm waves or whatever. Not the tech we use for literally all kind of wireless communications. Because why again? Because only the people that work with these things should have them? Oh so you mean the police and military should have assault rifles… Oh. No okay the child slaying stays, the electromagnetic hacker devices are satanic. Got it. Yeah I’ll get right on that.

    • _cryptagion [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article.

        • _cryptagion [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Because if you had, you would have realized the article was written by the BBC, a UK media outlet. You know, the same UK where guns are already banned.

          • @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Oh yeah, haha I saw that but thought fuck it, I need to vent