Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      834 months ago

      I remember Republicans checking out on elections back in 2018 because they bought hard into the Trump “elections are rigged” propaganda. The GOP lost seven Senate seats that year as conservative turnout plunged.

      I wonder if Democrats will make the same mistake in 2026.

      • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        624 months ago

        No, I don’t think Democrats are ready to make new mistakes yet. They still won’t abandon their devotion to the old mistakes.

      • BoofStroke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        94 months ago

        They made it in 2024. The results of abstaining or protest voting were obvious, and these idiots did it anyway. And here we are.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          The results of abstaining or protest voting were obvious

          Absolutely. The current Dem leadership is now wildly unpopular and vulnerable to primary. Just like after 2016, the seeds have been planted for a big anti-incumbent wave.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        I wonder if Democrats will make the same mistake in 2026.

        i really, really fucking hope this doesnt happen, i’m going to fucking lose my shit if it does. Because unless things change, it’s not looking great for the trump midterms right now.

      • @unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Shouldn’t be hard. All they have to say is “Remember the townhalls, and how they mocked you while you paid for them to make your lives worse? We’ll put it back.” They don’t even need to add anything, just try to rebuild. Anything would be a positive change when you’re sliding into the negative side of the scale (and in two years, it’ll be far far far to the left)

      • FundMECFS
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That makes no sense at all. 2018 was two years after Trump won in 2016, and he rarely claimed elections were rigged in 2016, because he won.

        In 2020, however, he was gloating about how elections were rigged, and republicans did okay in the midterms later in 2022.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          he rarely claimed elections were rigged in 2016, because he won.

          He was highly outspoken in 2016 straight up until the elections closed, then did a number of interviews after the fact where he insisted he could have won in states like California and New York if the vote hadn’t been rigged against him. There was also a big wave of “RINOs are undermining the party!” discourse, particularly after McCain spiked the Senate vote on repealing Obamacare that lead to a ton of internal GOP drama.

          In 2020, however, he was gloating about how elections were rigged, and republicans did okay in the midterms later in 2022.

          The J6 riot was the product of four years of Republican discourse, insisting elections were rigged. Once Trump was out of office and banned from Twitter, his ability to amplify conspiracy theories was diminished. The Republican media machine was able to pivot back to a “We’re the majority! We’re going to flood the polls! Red Wave!” exuberance and away from the internalized defeatism post-2016.