@cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agoOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square426fedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down10cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1external-linkOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.com@cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square426fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-square@TeamAssimilation@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglish11•3 months agoUnregulated capitalism. That’s why people in dominant market positions want less regulation.
minus-square@slumberlust@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoEntrenched companies often want more regulation to prevent startup competition. Pulling the ladder up behind them.
minus-square@TeamAssimilation@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoTo be fair, they want more regulation n others, not on them. Specially if they’re doing shady things.
minus-squarefinderlinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-23 months ago Extracting free resources of the land Not to be contrarian, but there is a cost to extract those “free” resources; like labor, equipment, transportation, lobbying (AKA: bribes for the non-Americans), processing raw material into something useful, research and development, et cetera.
minus-squarefinderlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-23 months agoIf basic economics get you upset, then alright. Bye o/
minus-squarerichmondezlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoWhile true, they tend not to bare the costs of the environmental damage, at least when these activities are poorly regulated.
deleted by creator
You misspelled capitalism.
Unregulated capitalism. That’s why people in dominant market positions want less regulation.
Entrenched companies often want more regulation to prevent startup competition. Pulling the ladder up behind them.
To be fair, they want more regulation n others, not on them. Specially if they’re doing shady things.
Not to be contrarian, but there is a cost to extract those “free” resources; like labor, equipment, transportation, lobbying (AKA: bribes for the non-Americans), processing raw material into something useful, research and development, et cetera.
deleted by creator
If basic economics get you upset, then alright.
Bye o/
Was about to post the same thing
While true, they tend not to bare the costs of the environmental damage, at least when these activities are poorly regulated.