• palordrolap
    link
    fedilink
    2513 months ago

    99% of people want a drop-in replacement for Windows that will install and run every possible Windows-compatible application, game and device without them having to make any extra effort or learn anything new. Basically Windows but free (in all senses).

    Any even slightly subtle difference or incompatibility and they’ll balk. Linux can never be that, and Microsoft will keep the goalposts moving anyway to be sure of it.

    Sure, a lot more works and is more user friendly than 15 years ago, but most people won’t make the time to sit down and deal with something new unless it’s forced on them… which is what Microsoft are doing with Win11.

    • @SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      153 months ago

      Most of the hobbyists I speak to that have failed linux desktop experiences mostly switch back to windows due to:

      1. Hardware compatibility issues.
      2. Microsoft office interoperability limitations of the web based office.
      3. Display scaling issues on multi-monitor setups and some linux applications.

      Personally for me the list is:

      1. Bluetooth not being detected on my particular asus laptop. (The same bluetooth chip works in other laptops)
      2. Multi-monitor scaling and resolution issues when 3 external monitors are connected via thunderbolt doc.
      3. Lack of good alternatives to fancyzones
      • @uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        fanzyzones

        Thanks!! This is just what I need. Pop_os has an equivalent in their DE and because work I have windows and I really miss it.

      • @8uurg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Add binary compatibility issues to that list: https://jangafx.com/insights/linux-binary-compatibility The moment you need software that is not packaged by your distro you either need to be lucky that whomever compiled it accounted for your setup, or compile it from scratch yourself (if open source and publicly available). Especially with closed source software (like most games) the latter isn’t even an option.

      • palordrolap
        link
        fedilink
        83 months ago

        Here’s an analogy: You can do your own gardening, or you can hire one of the two landscaping services in town.

        This sounds great, but these days, no matter who you hire, the people who show up 1) want to install a fountain and an advertisement billboard that will run off your water and electricity supply and 2) want the right to take what they like from your house by default, they’ll mysteriously “forget” and do it anyway even if you pay them not to.

        Furthermore, with their latest package, one of the landscaping companies are basically saying that if you don’t have a yard large enough for their fountain, you have to move house, which is only marginally better than the other one who will only work on gardens for houses they sold in the first place.

        (A previous version of this comment involved the word “lube”. I’m sure you can imagine the rest.)

    • @Chastity2323@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Honestly I think potentially a bigger factor is that there are very few manufacturers who sell machines with linux preinstalled. Very few people have ever installed an OS before or have any desire to do so.

      Also there is plenty of software with no real linux alternative even today unfortunately.

      • @Huschke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That is exactly why Chromebooks were (are?) so popular. You got a cheap laptop with an easy-to-use OS without having to do any install. And let’s be real here, most people don’t need anything more than a web browser.

        • @Chastity2323@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          And let’s be real here, most people don’t need anything more than a web browser.

          You would think. Surprisingly, i only know of one non techy person in my life for whom this was the case, and even they ended up needing to use some statistics software for school after switching to linux. Luckily, they were able to get it through a school-provided VM.

          People have all kinds of needs and those needs can change over time. For people who are deaf in one ear, there is no easy way to set the audio output to mono. That’s just one way that accessibility features are lacking. I know people who rely on apps like notability syncing their mac laptop to their ipad, which no app on linux can do. I know people who have specialized software for work such as VPN apps that simply do not exist on linux. I know people who do creative work for whom it would be a major learning curve at the very least to switch. It only takes one app or crucial feature to lock you out. Even I have to dual boot from time to time for firmware updates or to play games my friends want to play that aren’t on Linux.

          But you better believe I’m tracking all of these issues so I can switch people over as soon as they’re implemented ;)

    • @helloworld55@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Personally I believe that unless you’re able to do a slackware or gentoo installation, you’re not ready for Linux.

      /s but only kinda

      Linux users need to have a higher level of technical literacy than windows users. It just can’t be avoided unless you’re okay with potentially reinstalling your os at some point. The bar has been lowered a lot, but because other companies refuse to play nice with Linux, it’ll always be there.

      If you’re okay with that tradeoff, then yeah Linux is great. But a lot of people aren’t even aware of it and it causes a lot of pain