• @throwsbooks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12 years ago

    Because as much as trains and buses are great for everyday commuter movement (and having amenities within walking distance is key as well), there’s two issues:

    • Changing the infrastructure and zoning of an existing city is much easier said than done. Ripping up concrete, tearing down existing business and homes to increase densification, that’s a huge undertaking.
    • Trains never replaced the horse drawn carriage. You can never fully eliminate the need for cars because sometimes you need to move something big like a couch. Even if there’s less cars on the road, it’ll never be 0, as this also includes things like ambulances, and fire trucks that can’t rely on schedules.
    • @Silvus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Actually most cities had rail laid out and working commuter trains. The car manufacturers bought them up and purposely ran them into the ground to increase car sales. (Think Twitter) they were run like that.

    • @gramathy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      That’s what rentals are for. Yeah, there’s always going to be a need for low volume cargo transport and emergency response, but ultimately building cities so 90% of trips can be easily and comfortably accomplished via mass transit should be the goal. Nobody is suggesting transit can replace all cars.

    • @CannaVet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Changing the infrastructure and zoning of an existing city is much easier said than done.

      Fun how we had zero fucking problem doing it to every city in the country for cars. 🤷