• @danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    694 months ago

    I disagree. Democrats had the presidency, the house and the senate (filibuster proof). They chose a republican friendly solution that was just a bandaid on a broken system.

    All it did was piss off republicans and give them a rallying point while doing nothing to encourage democrats to vote.

    They should have had the balls to create a system that actually fixed the problems, but they didn’t.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      344 months ago

      There were like one or two very conservative Dems who derailed the single payer option when they had the filibuster proof majority. The main problem is not getting a solid party wide understanding of the goals they are aiming for ahead of the chances to do something about it.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 months ago

        Meanwhile Republicans can dissolve the Department of Education with a bare majority in both houses…

        • @lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          84 months ago

          Yeah the Republicans are basically one mind. I think I remember hearing about Karl Rove back in the day going around to Republicans that didn’t follow that they would take them out if they didn’t toe the party line. I think it’s only gotten worse since then with only the sycophants left.

          Dems are different. Like there’s no reason Bernie and AOC would be in the same party of Pelosi and Schumer but they are. This leads to compromises being necessary on the democratic party. Also, the voters for the Dems are just as diverse as no one ever seems happy with them either.

            • @lobut@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              34 months ago

              If you mean the progressive arm of the democratic party, then yes :)

              I wanted to say the old people need to go but Bernie is old and I don’t want him going anywhere.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        124 months ago

        Joe Lieberman said no to single payer… He is the one who blocked it from happening because his state had some insurance companies.

        But bootlickers running around frothing their their mouth how this is the best republicans would permit us to have 🤡

      • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        Actually no, It was an independent who killed the Public Option vote. There was one Dem who opposed the rules in the original bill around Abortion but he still voted yay in the end and Joe Lieberman was the Nay vote. Because they only reached 59 it was filibustered, so they clearly were not filibuster-proof.

        The last time DNC had an actual 60 without caucus was 1979.

    • @macarthur_park@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      144 months ago

      They only had a filibuster-proof senate counting the independent Joe Lieberman who caucused with democrats. Lieberman (and a few other dems tbh) wouldn’t support a single payer system, so the ACA was the best they could do.