• @CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1493 months ago

    That’s fucking wild! Mexico is not South Sudan or Afghanistan, failed states ruled by warlords. It will start with “we’re only targetting cartels” and conclude with “these terrorists are purposely using hospital staff as human shields, what would you have us do?!”

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      613 months ago

      Mexico is not South Sudan or Afghanistan, failed states ruled by warlords

      I’ll note that for the latter, it’s a failed state ruled by warlords because the US rolled in and fucked everything up.

        • @EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          103 months ago

          Arguably, Afghanistan has never been united as a nation in the way we think about it, at least not for long. The cycle seems to be short decades of control under some power followed by decades of decentralization and local powers.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          73 months ago

          I mean it wasn’t exactly a shining example of progress and order, but it wasn’t a failed state.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          53 months ago

          I mean given that the war on terror started in 2001, we don’t need to go back any further than 1980.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          133 months ago

          Okay, and? Like them or hate them (jk you should hate them) but they had a state; it wasn’t “a failed state ruled by warlords”.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              153 months ago

              No it’s not? A failed state is one in which the state can’t punish a significant amount of non-state sanctioned violence, which wasn’t the case in Afghanistan.

              • @FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                43 months ago

                I suppose if you use that definition then when America invaded it became a failed state run by warlords and now it has recovered.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness
                  link
                  fedilink
                  73 months ago

                  Yeah exactly. Now, being a non-failed state, they can start the long, gruelling process of cultural and political evolution. That’s why you’re hearing about Afghani human rights activists now but not ten years ago.

      • @ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        No, it’s a failed state because the cartels have more power than the government. Stop blaming your own country, traitor.

    • Ogmios
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      failed states ruled by warlords

      Do you have any idea how many candidates get murdered in elections in Mexico?

          • @CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            123 months ago

            Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant, but my point is that there are other countries that have similar issues to Mexico, but we don’t bomb them.

            • Ogmios
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Russia doesn’t share a border with your country, while being home to a number of brutal cartels run by ex US military special forces.

              Also, we are literally bombing Russia by proxy right now.