• The Quuuuuill
        link
        fedilink
        English
        351 month ago

        when the soviets valued reliability they meant they valued field serviceability. yeah, the t-34 broke down a lot, but it could also be back in service after breaking down quickly because it was simple to fix by a field mechanic. this ethos shows up throughout their entire weapons development process. basically of the powers in wwii,

        1. the americans valued quantity and quality
        2. the soviets valued quantity
        3. the germans valued quality
        4. the japanese started valuing quality but eventually had to embrace quantity due to a lack of quantity
        5. the british started valuing quantity due to lack of quantity and eventually got to embrace quality due to backing from allies and their own manufacturing capacity
        6. the italians never had either quantity or quality
        • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I think you crossed up quantity/quality in several places, because your comment reads very confusingly.

          Tangentially, my favorite part of the T-34 is the track striker plate

          For instance, the tracks on most of the German tanks were connected by pins with locking mechanisms that required special tools for field maintenance. The T-34 tracks were connected with pins without locking mechanisms. Instead, the pins stayed in place using the track’s motion and a welded striker plate on the tank’s hull. If a pin was lost, it was replaced by using the most basic tool, a hammer. Naturally, this was very time and cost-efficient.

          This is absolutely one of the most hilariously simple - and at the same time logically pragmatic - solutions I think I’ve ever come across in the field of mechanical design.

          • 100_kg_90_de_belin
            link
            fedilink
            41 month ago

            Didn’t the Soviets simply use a pencil to write in space instead of designing a pen that could work with zero gravity?

            • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              191 month ago

              Yes - but at the same time, the issue with pencils is that the graphite can break off and get into fun and interesting places, and graphite is highly conductive, so there’s a substantial risk of FOD when in zero-G

                • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 month ago

                  There’s also the bit where the first Soviet spacewalk almost ended in the first dead guy in space because the suit blew up like a goddamn balloon, and he had to stab his own fucking glove (!?!?!?!?!) to decrease pressure enough so he could fit back in the hatch. Say what you will about the Soviet Union, but the early cosmonauts had absolutely fucking MASSIVE balls.

      • @The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        151 month ago

        A lot of the old Soviet stuff works poorly with lots of relatively easy repairs, but didn’t give a fuck about the health and safety of the people operating them.

    • @orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      I mean, dig on Russian shit, sure… but I drive a 50 year old car and it’s not dying anytime soon. Of course, it’s German, so there’s that.

    • @invertedspear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      91 month ago

      Same initial thought, but then I considered that I trust a Cold War era jeep that’s been stored for decades to still work with a bit of quick off-the-shelf maintenance items than I would any Hummer era military vehicles to work after even a short span in storage.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        Most ww2 jeeps just need some new tyes, some replacement hoses, oil and a new battery, and they’re ready to go.