@essell@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-22 months agoIt's a rule that the existence of vegan shoes implies the existence of carnivorous shoeslemmy.worldimagemessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1322arrow-down10
arrow-up1322arrow-down1imageIt's a rule that the existence of vegan shoes implies the existence of carnivorous shoeslemmy.world@essell@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-22 months agomessage-square75fedilink
minus-square@dejected_warp_core@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•2 months agoNo. Instead, it implies that eating this shoe is better for your health than eating a non-vegan one.
minus-square@BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•2 months agoDo we have a term for individuals that refrain from eating shoes? Because vegan shoe or not, I identify as a person who doesn’t eat shoes.
No. Instead, it implies that eating this shoe is better for your health than eating a non-vegan one.
Do we have a term for individuals that refrain from eating shoes? Because vegan shoe or not, I identify as a person who doesn’t eat shoes.