@Fallstar@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agoA weird phrase is plaguing scientific papers – and we traced it back to a glitch in AI training datatheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1319arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1319arrow-down1external-linkA weird phrase is plaguing scientific papers – and we traced it back to a glitch in AI training datatheconversation.com@Fallstar@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-square@Saleh@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglish14•edit-21 month agoGoogle translate is using the same approach like an LLM. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Translate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_machine_translation So is DeepL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepL_Translator And before they were using neural network approaches they used statistical approaches, which are subject to the same errors as a result of bad training data.
minus-square@wewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoCheck the results though. Google translate is far far better at translation than a generic LLM.
Google translate is using the same approach like an LLM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Translate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_machine_translation
So is DeepL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepL_Translator
And before they were using neural network approaches they used statistical approaches, which are subject to the same errors as a result of bad training data.
Check the results though. Google translate is far far better at translation than a generic LLM.